i post the one piece threads 
I agree similarly. Degrowth includes a critique of the consumption economy and overproduction of unnecessary products, but there’s no incentive for capitalists and governments to actually pursue that in a way that makes sense for capitalism, so there’s no concrete path towards degrowth policy until something necessitates it. I do however appreciate the research being done as it provides a vision for socialists in industrialized and post-industrialized countries.
Per Jason Hickel, one of the leading advocates of degrowth, this review is selectively excluding a large amount of degrowth studies.
This hit piece has already come under heavy criticism and for good reason. The methodology really is extremely flawed.
The authors look only at studies with “post-growth” or “degrowth” in the title, but this ignores much of the key empirical work that has shaped and advanced the field recently. The strange thing is that the authors are fully aware of this broader literature, and yet they exclude it.
Not all degrowth research has “degrowth” in the title! Just as not all research on political economy has “political economy” in the title. Basics. Huge swathes of research are ignored… all the work on demand-side mitigation, sufficiency-oriented approaches, energy convergence, ecosocialism, decoupling, doughnut economics, etc — including work reviewed by the IPCC — all of it is ignored.
As Julia Steinberger pointed out, of the 33 papers published under her last major grant on degrowth, only two of them would qualify under this criteria.
Also, if you design your review to include opinion, guess what, you’re going to get a lot of opinion! This is true of any field. This tells us nothing about whether the empirical basis of current degrowth arguments is sound. For that, you need to assess the empirical studies that people actually use for this purpose. And again, most of those are not covered in this review.
Foundation issues too
Closest I can think of is libcom.org but also I think marxists.org has some anarchists included too.
(edit from anglo experience only)
This is how DSP becomes good at games
He was good when he was making silly gaming videos as a disembodied voice. Had a lot of good will from the fact that he was donating almost all his youtube earnings for years to charity and being ostensibly nice. He’s a not a complete reactionary dipshit, but he’s still a youtube drama channel
Wait did Tom Cotton get smoked by a contraption?
Explains a lot tbh
Man tumblr is so cucked, unbelievably dire website
Ah thanks for the correction!
Bit rusty on my Franco-American history, so apologies for anything off base.
Louisiana was populated by former French settlers of New France, which eventually becomes Quebec, called the Acadians that had their own nationalist movement and were booted by the English to current day Louisiana. After the Louisiana Purchase, there stopped being a flow of French settlers to the region since it was no longer France’s, whereas New France/Lower Canada kept bringing in settlers. New France/Lower Canada also had its own treaties with English/Upper Canada that kept cultural barriers better intact. The Anglo-French divide in Upper and Lower Canada was also more along religious boundaries so Catholics and Protestants had more established communities that didn’t exist when the Acadians moved to Louisiana, which meant that assimilating to the dominant culture (Anglo-Protestant) was a lot harder to resist. There’s also the factors of Louisiana being very close to the Caribbean, Mexico, and Southern states with large Black populations that made it more of a diverse cultural and ethnic milieu that Quebec never really had outside of Montreal.
Hi crime welcome back! How was the grilling?
Cowards didn’t even talk about the world land bridge in their declaration
Did these grifter hacks finally break from the LaRouchites?
If you read their declaration you’ll see it signed by reactionary self proclaimed “patriotic socialists” and “MAGA communists” like Jackson Hinkle, Infra Haz, and Eddie Smith.
He’s got undeniably good bants
Republicans love HP computer
The Democratic Party being anti democracy is a great bit, very funny