• 44 Posts
  • 311 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 22nd, 2023

help-circle

    1. The temperance movement wanted prohibition to be extremely difficult to repeal. They wanted abstinence from alcohol to be permanently enshrined in the legal and moral fabric of the nation.

    2. At the time, the Supreme Court’s interpretation of federal powers was more narrow than today. Any such act of Congress was likely to face an uphill battle because it would be seen as regulating commerce, and such powers were supposed to be left up to the individual states.


  • Prohibition was definitely the wrong way to go about it. It introduced all kinds of problems. I think the aim of ending alcohol consumption is a noble one, but the only way for it to work is for people to want to not drink.

    I think restricting the advertisement of alcohol (as stringently as we currently restrict the advertisement of tobacco) would be a huge step in the right direction.







  • An especially interesting example, given that the Swiss Confederation usually did all they could to prevent Swiss-on-Swiss fighting.

    Apparently in this case, a treaty had already been signed and the bulk of the Swiss defenders had returned home prior to the battle, intending to cede Milan to the French. The Swiss who stayed to fight were a smaller force of fresh reinforcements who were hungry for plunder and misinformed about the strength of the French army. They actually launched a surprise attack against the French instead of waiting for the French to reach Milan.












  • Huh.

    If Virginia hadn’t attempted to secede from the Union, thereby forcing West Virginia to secede from Virginia, would we have 49 states today?

    50 is such a round, satisfying number that I can’t help but wonder if we would have made Puerto Rico or another territory into a state to make up the difference.