It really should be easy enough to off this sack of shit. Actually it’d be hilarious if it was done in a real stupidly convoluted way to make it look as if it was some deep state type operation. Really rile up the cockroaches that support this pile of excrement so they can be stamped on.
Spot on. The British are indeed masters of being two faced bastards.
How do you know what’s it supposed to do, if no one actually wrote that down, other than
As a person.
I would like it to work
So i can do the things.
To be fair, at least that’s something…
Or maybe for testing the documentation is the code. The code does this, write a test that accepts it does this.
I like the concept of describing things in scenarios and having data objects embedded in the scenarios. I think gherkin if a bit too restrictive, the same way user stories are, but a more natural verbose scenario that was parameterised with variables tied to actual data makes it explicit what is supposed to happen and what data the system will consume, create or manipulate.
E: there is of course other types of documentation available
Praise Stallman
Apple greedy and bad right?
Yes.
No, I’m a lazy shite, I just did an image search for clippy 1984. I feel bad now I didn’t make more of an effort 😕
Has Russia starting sending their shills to the front line as well…
2/10 for effort here lads.
Very zen, and true…
Money talks, that’s why unions are so demonised
Removed by mod
Indeed, trickle down environmental improvements will come guided by the invisible hand of the market.
And you’re completely right, food supply should be protected. Maybe programmes to plant wild vegetation such as well suited local produce everywhere instead of bare concrete and wasteland could help, not only food supply but also the environment.
But then that would effect farming profitability, so that of course is too idealistic and not viable… I wish I was as clever as you.
Cool! This seems like an good write up on it
https://atoonk.medium.com/tcp-bbr-exploring-tcp-congestion-control-84c9c11dc3a9
Bottleneck Bandwidth and Round-trip propagation time (BBR) is a TCP congestion control algorithm developed at Google in 2016. Up until recently, the Internet has primarily used loss-based congestion control, relying only on indications of lost packets as the signal to slow down the sending rate. This worked decently well, but the networks have changed. We have much more bandwidth than ever before; The Internet is generally more reliable now, and we see new things such as bufferbloat that impact latency. BBR tackles this with a ground-up rewrite of congestion control, and it uses latency, instead of lost packets as a primary factor to determine the sending rate.
People who use the term grownup in this context are ironically the most insufferable entitled brats. Just another case of scumbags projecting their own flaws.
UK as an example, tories have gutted what democracy was there, now you can’t swim in the water and go to prison for 10 years if you’re deemed a nuisance
If Putin was as supporting Israel, you hexbear bootlickers would be full critical support
For smashing things