Same reason why banks kept giving loans to Trump. He had so much debt that their best option for a long time was to just give him more money in the hopes he could use it to earn enough to repay all the loans. Sunk-cost fallacy at the major financial level.

Well you’re forgetting about the big unbang, which occurred just before the big bang and condensed all matter and energy into a tiny speck.

So they did just as much as the protesters in this case.

That’s not even half as clever as you think it is.

Are you confused about the shitpost part or the obvious part

A card holder on your phone is just a different kind of wallet.

So you think athletes’ careers are worth more than the average person’s life. That’s pretty fucked up.

It’s so cute when they dress up in their Trump cosplay suits.

Yeah I’m sure the West is planning a massive land invasion of Russia in the middle of winter, you figured it out.

I love any game with a handcrafted map and some exploration. Even Satisfactory, a factory building game, does an excellent job at that. Procedural generation has its uses but lacks soul I guess.

I stopped playing totk partially because I kept hitting the wrong buttons. But the Switch has a way to remap them so I used that and it was still confusing somehow lmao

That’s probably why it’s posted in a forum for real headlines that look like they’re from The Onion.

Yeah I’m such a fool for paying off my card balance every month and taking advantage of cash back programs. I should be smarter and pay with cash so it costs me more.

The credit card company isn’t losing money because it’s already determined that giving people cash back won’t outweigh the interest and fees etc. that they’re really making money from. They use incentive programs to lure people in, hoping they won’t be able to pay off their balance each month. Those who can are basically getting discounts from the cash back program.

Where did the extra 5% come from?

Removed by mod

lmao epic is basically owned by the ccp, explain how that’s better

Then the academics should get better at taking it from them :)

The people with the money don’t understand the science. If you can’t convince them that your science is worth investing in then why would they give you money? What’s really shocking is that a Nobel prize winner isn’t smart enough to understand that.

The system was literally invented by humans and follows our shitty nature perfectly.