TheLepidopterists [he/him]

  • 1 Post
  • 631 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2021

help-circle








  • I assume from some of them talking about props that these are for cosplayers at cons? But all the ones specifically about hugs remind me of this book we read our kid called “Don’t Hug Doug” about how some people don’t want to be touched and you need to get permission before showing people physical affection.

    At one point it points out that you can hug a porcupine, but it’s not recommended.

    Very cute book.


  • We could say the same for gambling too though, right? It’s about as old and has similar cultural effects.

    Personal betting is thousands of years old. Gigantic billionaire dollar smart phone betting companies are extremely recent.

    You will never convince people to quit betting their buddies 10 bucks over whose favorite team will score more points this weekend. You absolutely can, and if you as a government care about your citizens at all, must, stop DraftKings from taking all the rent money out of a poor family’s bank account.

    that barrier to entry means very few people would end up doing it.

    Enough people would do it and distribute it, that it would drive up deaths and injuries significantly

    I question the irrepressability of gambling being limited to the small scale. Unlike alcohol production which has a pretty big physical footprint, a pretty big gambling operation could just go through encrypted channels and stuff to keep it stealthy.

    One: the barrier to entry would reduce the societal impact a lot

    Two: you could still work to shut these places down, it would just be more work.

    Also, I was thinking about currently still illegal gambling stuff like dogfighting or cockfighting. Isn’t it possible that people could get pushed to more harmful types of gambling like that if it gets pushed underground?

    I doubt it.

    First of all it was illegal half a decade ago.

    Do you have reason to believe that dogfighting has dropped specifically in the last 6 years?

    Per the ASPCA it’s been on the decline since the 90s (when, remember, all this app casino shit that has been normalized enough in SIX YEARS that multiple posters in this communist instance are defending it, was illegal), but has been on the rise again “in recent years” due to the internet making it easier to organize, so if anything it’s gotten more common along with sports betting.

    Furthermore, in the Citations Needed ep they mentioned that gambling constantly desensitizes gamblers to the risk and they start making riskier, higher stakes bets over time. If anything, willingness to do riskier bets is going to make these people more likely to go to a dogfight, not less.


  • I do think that the substances have important differences on top of the competency gap between countries.

    One of these is made from one plant, often imported. The other can be made by anyone with a waterproof container and literally any plant.

    The one that’s easier to make is also ingrained in society as a way to form bonds with ones fellows by letting your guard down in a social environment, while the other basically removed you from society so the number and type of person who’s going to resist the prohibition is very different.










  • One: cigarettes should be banned Two: I’m ambivalent about alcohol because it’s been part of human culture basically since human culture has existed, it feels almost like cultural erasure to ban it- nonetheless alcoholism needs to be treated more seriously in this country, there is almost no treatment available and the barrier to purchase is non-existent.

    Three: alcohol is clearly different because Smirnoff doesn’t make deadly poisonous bad batches of vodka on the regular, and if you ban it outright ,then people making it in their bathtubs will.

    Small scale, illegal but irrepressible sports betting between friends is less harmful, small scale, illegal but irrepressible alcohol production is incredibly dangerous.