Makes sense. Ford is negotiating with the union and doesn’t want to show its hand.
Plus, getting more familiar with the manufacturing side of the business could actually be a good exercise for the engineers.
Makes sense. Ford is negotiating with the union and doesn’t want to show its hand.
Plus, getting more familiar with the manufacturing side of the business could actually be a good exercise for the engineers.
Location (country, state, city)?
Okay, thanks for explaining.
If I understand correctly, you’re saying that a person’s sex should only be referenced when it is relevant, which is only in a narrow set of situations. Any reference in speech to a person should not invoke his sex.
I’d be surprised if his most controversial opinion is related to grammar.
No need to call anybody a quack. I’m just trying to understand your controversial opinion.
Social categorization is incredibly vague, so it’s still not clear to me what you feel should be abolished.
Why only on Lemmy, and what good examples are there?
What is gender abolition, the abolition of any distinctions between male and female?
You could try dropping the condescending tone. Just because someone disagrees with you doesn’t mean he is uneducated.
I would also recommend being polite and using the charity principle. You generally won’t change someone’s mind by berating him.
Being anti-socialism is caring about people.