Oh, I actually meant Windows at home. Windows at work is definitely problematic.

But at home, for my own stuff, Windows just works, with zero setup or maintenance hassle. I used to do the whole Linux thing, had set up dual boot (again for games that only work on Windows ) it was not only not fun, what was I getting out of it? I found myself not even booting to Linux because it literally was not providing me with anything I needed.

Hah, with no attempt to explain because it’s very self explanatory.

Unironically me as an IT professional who uses Windows. It just works. I have to fuck around with all that shit all day, I don’t want to go home and do it too.

Maybe it could still fit…it’s capable of annihilating you but if you are well trained and prepared you could have controls over it

You’re the reason my Mondays are always chaos

Yeah, that’s exactly the worst case scenario. he gets to do what he did and live to the end of his days in a cushy mansion . That ain’t consequences.

Productive rich people like creatives are not the problem unless they do problematic things. Billionaires are always a problem and are exploitative by their very nature.

Just exposing your own delusion like that? Brave

You can make this law work by putting requirements on it, such as to an audience or whatever. And then it’s no different than being charged for shouting bomb or fire. Two lies you CAN be charged for.

I’m one of those. I don’t know if you realize or not, but there are a stupid number of examples of rich people commiting rather horrible crimes and never seeing jail.

I’m absolutely all for Trump facing consequences. But I’ll believe it when I see it. This country is made for the rich.

A lot of people swear by this whole “death of the author” philosophy because it let’s them ignore the literal stated intent of the author in favor of whatever pet theory they have. Which is fine, but you can’t use it in a debate about theories about the work. There isn’t a right answer to what you want to believe, but there often IS a right answer to what the actual author actually intended, especially modern authors in the age of information.

Did you feed it the article as well? Just wondering how it got the details of a recent article

But there’s a huge range between “both sides are almost the same” and “democrats are perfect”

Some people like dressing comfortable and prefer simple styles. It doesn’t make them less than.

People like this love when their elitist or exclusionary opinions are countered by the masses. Just makes them feel even better. Source, I was one of them in my younger days.

For the love of God please just say latinos. You don’t need to police our language.

Latines is better than Latinx which is a monstrous perversion, but spanish is just fine the way it is.

I feel lucky to be making 20 an hour but it is NOT enough, especially having kids.

Yeah I’m gonna distance myself from you here. I’m not pro Israel. They have done and continue to do some horrible shit and I’ve seen first hand the effects of that. The unfiltered hatred some people there possess shocked me. They did not lose the public relations war, their actions alone have made their public relations what it is.

I was just advocating for nuance and honesty.

I’m gonna distance myself from you here… What Israel has been doing is wrong. They haven’t "list the

You’re getting downvoted but you’re not wrong. I lived in Israel for 4 years and I was in an Arab neighborhood. They were mostly christian, but they were all pre-israel descendants and they had all the same rights as anyone else.

I’m super against what the government of Israel does, but apartheid just doesn’t fit.

I have also lived in south Africa, post apartheid but close enough that I’m very familiar with what it really was.

I see why apartheid is used, in some ways it is descriptive and useful but it ignores a lot and is ultimately inaccurate like you say.