Sandinband [any, comrade/them]

  • 0 Posts
  • 35 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 24th, 2020

help-circle

  • (6)

    I do feel like your stance here kind of stigmatizes queer couples in a way I’m a bit uncomfortable about.

    I am a queer adoptee. Queer people can have biological children. Queer people are not entitled to another person’s child anymore than a cishet person is.

    think you’re writing me off as a narcissist that I am very much not

    “Narcissist” is not an insult, having a stigmatized personality disorder is not an insult and it is ableist to act like it is.

    Honestly, my experiance in childcare, and one shared by many people I know who’s experiance with their biological parents were negative, is that a person’s biological family are often the WORST people for that child.

    This is anecdotal and the options you dismissed for yourself previously like kinship and community care center the child while not forcing them to be with their abusers.

    “Parental rights” is a right wing dogwhistle for a reason, and a cover for abuse.

    Bringing up parental rights in a discussion about the reproduction rights of marginalized people and the rights of adoptees is disingenuous and irrelevant. As mentioned, these groups are more likely to have their children stolen from them to be sold to white, wealthy people. That has nothing to do with right wing dogwhistles.

    Thats awful. Can I just like, not do that though? https://adopteerightslaw.com/faq-adoptee-original-birth-certificates/

    I also can’t shake the feeling that there is something racist or “woke segregation” about this attitude as well? I have mixed feelings about it. An actual transracial adoptee is telling you the effects it has on us and you’re talking about your white feelings. See the sources for other transracial adoptees experiences.

    I’m a bit hesitant to say that a naive child who thinks they want to keep their child should be able to But they should be able to be coerced into giving away their child forever? Especially when many adoptions from Korea, Vietnam, and Haiti did not have informed consent and the parents weren’t aware they would never be able to see their child again?

    Are we actually being child-first here or are we being biological parent-first? The reproductive rights of marginalized people and the rights and wellbeing of adoptees are both important. The wants of potential adoptive parents are irrelevant when compared to the rights of others.

    But I mean, is your answer here to leave kids in the system? Surely a stable home is better for kids than the system? And again the more I write about this the more I want to say, what about kids from genuinely abusive homes.

    The majority of children in the foster system are there due to neglect that can be solved through financial support. The minority of children experiencing physical or sexual abuse can be removed from their abusers via kinship care as priority, community care second, and guardianship last as I said before. The adoption industry does not need to exist.

    And the more I read about your stance the more I think your stance is inappropriately weighting the rights of a biological parent OVER that of the child, while claiming to be child-first.

    Marginalized people deserve reproductive rights. Marginalized people deserve to not have their children taken away as punishment for being marginalized. In the comment that started our reply chain, I said that adoption was a tool for genocide and listed the examples of Indigenous children being taken from their families and Korean children being sold as spoils of war. Yes, I do care about the biological families rights. I prioritize the rights and wellbeing of adoptees first, and biological families second. You see adoption as the solution because you believe the propaganda that most adoptees are either being abused or were orphans which is just not true. I hope you actually take the time to read the sources and listen to the people you claim to care about.



  • (4) -Who is investigated is also affected by racism, “One of the most striking findings in a recent study is that more than half of all Black children will experience a child-welfare investigation by the time they reach age 18—53%.” and this incredibly important paragraph “There are longstanding stereotypes that Black parents don’t really love their children, that it’s easy to separate the bonds of Black parents and children, that Black children are better off in the care of other caregivers—especially white caregivers. I could go down the list of all of the stereotypes that paint Black mothers as defective, as pathological, as neglectful, incapable of caring for their children. And those stereotypes influence people’s decisions about child abuse and neglect. There’s a whole slew of studies that show that doctors are more likely to suspect child abuse if the child is Black than white, with the exact same injuries. We could trace this back to the slavery era.” https://time.com/6168354/child-welfare-system-dorothy-roberts/

    Sexual abuse and foster care

    -While around 9% of children are separated from their families as a result of sexual abuse, “One study found that girls living in foster homes are a particularly vulnerable group. The investigation examined 155 adolescent girls in foster care and found that 81% had experienced sexual abuse. 68% of girls reported being sexually abused by more than one individual.” and “A Johns Hopkins University study found that children in foster care are four times more likely than other children to be sexually abused, and those who live in group homes experience an abuse rate of 28 times those of other children.” In addition to foster care increasing the risk of sexual abuse, there is no reason a child experiencing sexual abuse could not be removed from their abusers and placed in kinship or community care. https://helpingsurvivors.org/child-sexual-abuse/foster-care/

    Family separation and queerness

    -Children whose parents support them being trans are being investigated, the same system that determines what constitutes abuse is bigoted and will be used against any marginalized person. “Gov. Greg Abbott issued a letter directing the state’s Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) to conduct “prompt and thorough” investigations into the families of trans and gender expansive youth who’ve received gender-affirming care, asserting that the care can “legally constitute child abuse.”” In a way, this reflects on the previously mentioned examples of Indigenous and Romani children being taken away, because their ways of live (traditional native food, Romani camps) didn’t line up with that the white majority sees as fit, their children were taken to be “raised right.” https://time.com/6150964/greg-abbott-trans-kids-child-abuse/








  • Like, I want a kid if I ever get decently financially stable, I love kids and the idea that I might never get to have a few of my own is a major source of my depression. But I’m getting old and my current partners both like and want kids but are far away from me, and not financially stable either, and are trans women so we can’t have biological kids

    I honestly don’t see how this isn’t framing adoption as your last resort before just not having kids?

    Anyway the options you present above arent really available for me.

    If adoption or an alternative has to happen the priority should be the child, not the adults.

    I wouldnt do any of this anyway? Is this stuff inherent to adoption somehow in ways that Im not aware of?

    Yes. This is standard in the us.

    Also sounds like it would be better if I adopted (or did guardianship for?) a white child

    Yes, if you are white it is better you raise a white child than a non white child

    And there would still be cases like teen parents who are simply not ready to raise a kid.

    With access to better sex ed, contraceptives, and abortion there would not be a large domestic supply of infants. Also many teen parents do not want to give their child up for adoption but are coerced with financial incentives.

    I mean, I agree with this, but we’re a long way off from providing economic justice for everyone

    The current solution to this is not to buy a human being, it is to support struggling families via mutual aid or the previous alternatives to adoption mentioned. Obviously under the current system there are children in need but the system perpetuates the conditions that create children in need so they can be sold to white, wealthy families who want infants (i specify infants as they are the gold standard for what most adoptive families want and theyre the most expensive to adopt) so choosing to participate in it helps create financial incentives for the industry

    I fucked up the formating so I have to put this down here, sorry

    not active in my community. And unfortunately because of my autism and the way that childcare is corrupted by capitalism my options for working in childcare are limited

    That is not what I meant by community care, a different example: you’re a white person who grew up in say New Orleans, it would be better for you to raise a white child also from New orleans so they would be closer to their biological family and raised in a somewhat similar culture to what they would have anyway. This is preferable to you buying a Black kid from Haiti and raising them in a majority white area.

    If youre officially diagnosed with autism it will heavily effect your ability to adopt in the traditional sense. The system is also incredibly ableist, which effects which mothers have their children taken away and in turn, also effects who can buy their child. If youre not officially diagnosed it probably won’t effect you or if you have enough money

    Also fucked up the formating again and can’t do a quote for your last part, sorry

    What sources do you want for my experience not being “more than anecdotal”? The examples of children being taken from their mothers due to ableism, racism, imperialism, and classim? How adoptees do better when not completely separated from their country of birth and culture to be raised by and around no one who looks like them? Adoption being a tool of genocide? Other experiences from actual adoptees and not the adoption agencies that profit off of selling us?

    Genuinely asking


  • Alternatives to adoption that are not buying a human being:

    Kinship care: a lot of people do this without realizing its an alternative to adoption, ex: being raised by a grandparent or other relative

    Community care: most examples i can think of are indigenous children being raised by non relatives in their community so they can be raised in the culture but this can be applied to other groups, ie: its better if a poc is raised by another poc within their culture so they aren’t separated from it, also they don’t have to experience the awful abuse that is one’s adoptive parents and entire extended family being racist to you (also made worse if the adopters are in a majority white area so you get the racism at school and home, ask me how I know agony-shivering )

    Worse case scenario that isn’t adoption that really wouldn’t be as common as non adoptees think: guardianship, you don’t own the child, you do not get to rename them, you do not get to have their birth certificate redone with your information which seals their old birth certificate - making it incredibly difficult to find their biological family if they want to, and you do not get to hide their medical information from them

    At the end of day, the focus should be on the children and not the adults who want a child. Getting the child back to their biological family should be the priority. There really aren’t as many “kids without homes” that non adoptees think there are and many of the “domestic supply of infants” as mentioned in the roe v wade overturning wouldn’t exist if it weren’t for systemic racism and the resulting poverty.

    Also it is incredibly hurtful to think of adoption as your worst case scenario when you can’t have a biological child. We are people harmed by the worst of capitalism, misogyny, and imperialism, not a last resort.




  • The adoption industry steals children from poor/marginalized mothers and sells them to wealthy, typically white people. It is used hand in hand with genocide like with indigenous children and also children from war zones are used as spoils of war for the invaders like in Korea.

    An Israeli couple buying a Palestinian child made an orphan by Israel is just another part of genocide. There is no way they would teach the child of their culture or try and maintain contact with their biological family

    Edit: this is my criticism of the entire adoption industry as an adoptee, im not opposed im this scenario purely because theyre Israeli