FWIW I don’t consider you a Marxist in any sense of the word, either. You use the lingo, but in practice you’re no different from an anarchist.

They don’t want to cooperate with China, they want to compete.

My answer to that, is the same as before- laughter. It’s certainly not competition they want, otherwise they would have just left things be- they are rentiers, hegemonists, imperialists- and it is submission they desire. Or do you think that within capitalism and imperialism as the system we live in today, big corporates want to compete with- say, labor, or even with other corporations, rather than buy off the competition and grow fat and complacent while cutting margins? This is what it always is and was, this is the nature of capital, this is undeniably the approach the west has built for itself over centuries and maintains (albeit a crumbling system) to this day- there may be some competition within it, but it is only a means to the end, a means that capitalists, and imperialists as their highest form, ultimately have a consistent track record of (and it only makes sense from their perspective- it’s the nature of the system) seeking to eradicate in turn once they reach their desired end.

I’m talking about the world economy and power politics. If the US keeps pursuing this path of foreign policy and no longer wants to play friendly, then, yes, either China or Russia (or some other country) will have to step up and be the competing imperialist power.

Once again, you’re mixing the notion of “competition” - anti-imperialist competition ie. resistance at that- as imperialism. This is nonsense. Is the competition, the struggle of the Palestinians, “imperialist?” Bullshit.

either China or Russia (or some other country) will have to step up and be the competing imperialist power. Either that, or they have to choose the submissive role, a puppet government. There’s no way around this. We live in the era of imperialism and globalization - all countries have to be interconnected by some way and we can’t backtrack

I agree, we can’t backtrack. We are moving forward- what is being built now, is a stage of society beyond imperialism, and from there, gradually ideally beyond capital. Did you think that stage would be characterized by non-competitive, disunited, unfocused (anarchic) groups or states, fumbling in the dark and refusing to play power politics? Do you think that would be “progress,” or uplift the human condition? Did you think that with the ushering in of socialism, humanity would suddenly cease to be globalized? This sounds more like a dark age to me than anything else, and it certainly is not what any communist movement, but also any sensible leftist movement, would advocate- it is not what the former movements (SDS, Black Panthers, civil rights movement, etc) you positively described advocated also, for that matter.

The individual could not compete against tribalism (not that we evolved that way to begin with); tribalism could not compete against early complex societies, and those in turn could not compete over the long run against monarchism and/or more stratified societies, and then finally in turn against the imperialists. Feudalism and the rights of nobles gave way to capitalism and the rights of the capitalists- each class, larger than the next. And the next class in turn, the ideally universal class, which comprises all the masses of humanity- that is what was theorized by Marx to come next, what was determined to be the next logical conclusion, with the means to outcompete and truly liberate our species once and for all from the contradictions- the class struggle, the alienation, etc. that has plagued humanity for millennia.

Something like BRICS is an alternative, not a revolutionary new thing, but just a plain alternative to what already exists. That’s not inherently a good or bad thing. But when we have the US pushing countries into competiting spheres of influence, what happens in a system like this? The same that already happened before.

This hasn’t happened before, certainly not in the same way. But you won’t listen regardless, will you? What we are seeing is the development and cooperation of the non-western “bloc”- if it can be called that- the west vs. the rest, really- wherein the colonized have finally reached a parity within the greater global system (rather than individual states doing so, such as with Japan, or with- while they were not imperialist, which in itself literally disproves your point- the Soviets), and where they all, diverse and flawed as they may be, some (most) even capitalist in their own right, are coming together in the face of their common enemy now that they truly have the means to do so, against the global system of capitalist superprofits/extraction that is imperialism, the highest stage of capital.

And they are not “rebuilding imperialism, but with the south in charge” or whatever nonsense. That’s your western victim/purist mentality at play; a seat is at the table for the west when they want to start acting like human beings again, for the first time in 500 years if not more (ie. revolutionary change, getting rid of the colonial mentality, etc). A system of actual rules (rather than western diktat and double standards), increasingly more equitable trade, win-win cooperation, a diverse and open dialogue for peoples- all peoples, unlike how it has only ever been with the west- having their voices heard and determining their path forwards themselves, and- if you want to be a healthy cynic about it, with state entities keeping each other in check (the most prominent, developed, competitive, and powerful of which today is an AES) to prevent the prior order from returning with a different head at the helm.

I’m done with this discussion. Because I’ve said all there is to say, about it, and you’ve said yours (nebulously gesturing at “competition, power politics bad, there is no alternative to recreating the wheel,” etc). I’ve already linked other sources, but I don’t think you’ve even so much as properly absorbed what I’ve said already (in any of my comments so far), it just hasn’t been able to sink in yet. Anything else I could say would just be repetitions of what I’ve already said before, and more to convince anyone else looking in on this conversation than anything else- but I simply won’t. I recommend actually checking the sources linked by me- or by the other commenter in this thread in regards to Vijay Prashad and the Tri-Continental- if you actually have interest in seeing it all spelled out for you by people more practiced and articulate in doing so than I am, with a far greater understanding of the subject, and with sourcing and (in regards to their published works) peer review and renown.

As far as I’m concerned, your own take on the matter is little different from the neoliberal “end of history” mentality- that certainly seems to be what you’re trapped in- just with a colorful “leftist revolution” aesthetic and idealism behind it all. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the only groups you seemed to mention positively (presumably without looking at their actual approach and analysis to things) were now-defunct leftist organizations, the Palestinian resistance who haven’t even their rightful sovereignty and autonomy as a state within their own internationally recognized territories, and the “hermit kingdom” of North Korea (for all that that name is deeply unfair and a smear in and of itself- so let’s say, “pseudo-hermit socialism” or “socialism, but under siege and isolated from much of the world”).

Once again, for convenience:

The video linked by another commenter, with Vijay Prashad on hyper-imperialism

The articles- on hyper-imperialism and the “churning of the global order” (or rather, the anti-imperialist developments of the global south and world) by the Tri-Continental

Geopolitical Economy Report

Richard D. Wolff

Michael Hudson (article on predictions for 2024 and onwards, and describing in detail exactly what I’ve been talking about whether in regards to how imperialism is being outcompeted as a world system- and only has terrorism, disruption, destruction left- and just how the entire world is positioned, with the prospects for the future, etc)

My bad, also 🤮

Good. While they’re all deeply vassalized and compromised by the imperialist bloc, this is a matter of basic human decency; it is literally the least they could do, to recognize the Palestinians as humans, something that the rest of the west is still incapable of doing.

As a Canadian, it feels bad, knowing that the country I live in will never do this (not within our present system and regime, certainly), and will instead stand with genocide and with white supremacy right to its last gasps- that it is doing so right now, the fact that this country is a settler-state whose very existence is hinged upon these racist and murderous crimes continuing to take place. What is to be next? Either revolution and from it socialism, or genocide.

Honestly, if the US directly goes after agrarian infrastructure across the global south (it already undermines it, and always has, particularly through the IMF) the same needs to be done back in turn to it. Mutually assured destruction should apply to more than just nukes- they can see how they like them apples.

Our efforts, whether as a collective or as individuals, will carry the torch forward though (and on a greater scale build up to condemnations by entities as massive as the states of China/Russia). The macro is made up of the micro, however small and useless it may feel.

If you ask me? As long as I live, I will carry that flame- that flame that condemns and exposes the US and its Anglo settler-colonial brethren and framework as the genocidal, imperialist, irreconcilable evils that they are. If I have anything to say about it (and I do) it shall be known as such to all those I can spread awareness to as well; and even when and as the empire crumbles, it go in the dustbin history alongside Nazi Germany, imperial Japan, and the various other European empires- and it will be remembered, at that, as the inspiration for all the settler-colonial genocides they committed (which it is- AmeriKKKan settler ideology even influenced its British progenitors to go all-in on the specific “complete replacement” settler genocide approach) and as the most genocidal, destructive, and wretched nation in history; a nation which went so far as to dream of and seek to inflict eternal war and division upon the rest of the world, which sought what no other had come near before (global hegemony) and actively threatened not only the lives of billions, but the entire species and even the biosphere in the process.

I’m just one person, and so are you. But the same sentiment is felt across billions- it’s even felt among an increasing number of those within AmeriKKKa itself, those who are waking up and realizing that the US regime promises nothing but death, destruction, deprivation, and dehumanization not only for the rest of the world, but even the majority of their own citizenry, and even for its traditional base of support (whites). The resentment, the awareness, and the resolve is to be found amongst an increasing mass of voices- in a very real sense, as just as “never again” for the Holocaust, also applies to the current Holocaust being inflicted on the Palestinians, so too does it apply to “never again” for the AmeriKKKan settler-colonial, hegemonic, genocidal project which inspired, created the conditions for, funded, armed, and has backed this genocide every step of the way; so too does it apply to “never again” for the US regime which has for the nth time revealed its true face as a white supremacist, terrorist state with no restraint nor qualms on how far it will go to eradicate and enslave the rest of the world (and increasingly, its own citizens).

Humanity is learning from this, and humanity is moving past this. It’s our job to remember, to speak the condemnation and pass it down, and to act in what little ways we can- which add up to larger movements as a whole- to disarm and dissolve the empire. And when we’re done- whether it takes generations past us or not- the US will face justice, the Zionists will face justice, reparations will be made, and the US and the genocidal settler-imperialist system and ideologies it has championed will be nothing more than a shitstain on history, forever warned about, forever memorialized (as a shitstain), to ensure its crimes never happen again.

And that’s where we’re headed, IMO. Someday ol’ Genocide Joe, Netanyahu, and the whole crew will be remembered not only akin to Hitler and Goebbels, but as part and parcel of the same monstrous imperialist package, one exemplified and embodied by the US. Someday there will be statues about this, and the Zionists and the AmeriKKKan regime will occupy the same place in the greater cultural imagination of the world, that the Nazis, or zombies (for pop culture), or all sorts of other monstrous entities hold; and someday, if we play our cards right, and the rest of the world does as well, they will be remembered- over generations- as the scourges on humanity that in a very real and personal sense inflicted such horrors, indignities, and hardship upon the majority of the world.

The US represents just 0.5% of the world population. The “international community” in whole, around 10%. And that’s with extensive immigration from the global south, and with all sorts of populations within the imperial cores to begin with who have good reason to hold the ancestral grudge, the awareness of the evil of the western imperialist order- descendants of slaves, of refugees, of indigenous peoples who still to this day suffer genocide, etc. And constantly, the empire victimizes even its own, more and more so- each day, tens of thousands if not tens of millions of new grudges are accumulated even within the imperial cores themselves, memories to be held onto and cherished as important lessons as to the depravity of the current regime and the need for it not only to end, but to be dismantled such that it may never rise again or see the light of day. Time is on our side; facts are on our side; the very nature of humans, to seek human dignity and equality, is on our side. Our words carry weight in that sense. And the end result of all this (though whether the species will live to see it) will be that justice will be seen, even if that justice comes in the form of extinction- the US regime will pay; the genocidaires, thieves, and liars who have sustained the empire will pay (even if that is a matter of condemning them as they rot in the grave, or- ideally, even as an atheist- burn in hell); and the ideology shall be destroyed, or it shall destroy itself (and the entire world in the process).

This is undeniably what the US is trying to do. They want to drive competition.

Also, figured I’d go back to this sentence- no offense, but- AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA… no.

Does banning TikTok, Huawei, accusing China of “overcapacity,” etc. sound like “driving competition?” You’re falling for the capitalist drivel, whether you realize it or not- the US is trying to maintain its rentier dominance, over industries, over defence (or rather, terror against the entire world), over finance, over trade, etc…

Capitalists have always claimed they’re about “competition.” The truth is very much “do as I say, not as I do,” however. Was it “competition” that built up the British empire, or shameless plundering, mercantilism, and the outright destruction of native industries across the globe, for instance? And can we call the US’ own development- first heavily protectionist, then after indebting and destroying all its competitors, going full Marshall Plan on them, “competition?” Can we call the US foreign policy, the Monroe Doctrine, the abuses of the dollar (and the US’ jealous guarding of its exorbitant privilege) “competition?” Were the Plaza Accords “competition?” Are the various oligopolies that dominate the US seeking “competition?”

Just… no. Please, educate yourself. As another commenter in this chain has noted- Vijay Prashad is a good starting point (https://lemmygrad.ml/comment/4301042). Or Michael Hudson. Or Prof. Wolff. Or Geopolitical Economy Report. If you don’t understand these things you’re always just going to be misled.

If we also consider how coupled the US is to the world economy, a drastic drop in global power could mean the sort of sanctions the US state has been inflicting on other countries end up on it

Hell, nevermind sanctions, a drop in US power will mean- as we are seeing- the development of alternatives; the world simply won’t need the US anymore, all their tools of extortion will be undone, and increasingly states will choose the alternatives- or develop their own- rather than deal with the US, which has always, always been a malicious, treacherous actor.

Countries will increasingly develop their own domestic agriculture, where the US had formerly shackled them to its own, discouraged such developments, and supported (in some/many cases, enforced) the development of export economies, wholly beholden on the imperial cores instead. Alternatives to western media, technology, to western institutions ranging from education to international justice or arbitration- will develop. Countries will move past the western chokeholds from all industries, from pharmaceuticals, to industrial development (within their own countries at that!), to developing infrastructure for their own inter-global southern trade (for instance, inter-African trade as a key example of where this is so clearly necessary, and where such struggles are undergoing), to finance, and so on.

And personally, I look forward to seeing it. Whatever is beholden to the west, owned by the west, should not be trusted, and countries are not only seeing the west increasingly once again go mask-off as the bad actors they are, but now, with viable alternatives, moving, slowly but surely, en masse away from it. The future of the west will be pariahs if they keep it up, but even in the hypothetical scenario of genuine communist revolution and establishment within the west- the levers of control the west has only ever abused so far, will increasingly be gone, and the rest of the world is never going to hand them back- it’s all Joever for western hegemony, for western influence, for the western era (500 years of monstrosities, unprecedented terror and actual barbarism).

And if countries don’t like the developing Chinese, Russian, BRICS alternatives- by all means, that’s fine (well, I’d call it nonsense, but it’s fine). For instance, India banned TikTok. More power to them, or whatever. But what we’re moving towards is a world where India, and all these other countries, can make their own TikToks, their own Facebooks or whatever they want- a world where, hopefully, each and every chip of western capital will be lost. Frankly if you ask me? China should probably see about helping India break off from western tech, even if it’s building up their own new competitors, surely an arrangement can be made- but it’s a whole new world, and what is “west” is gonna be on the way out. Hopefully we live to see Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta, Ford, General Electric, Pfizer, Monsanto, Nestle, Amazon, Coca-Cola, Disney, etc… (basically list any and every western multinational) kick the bucket, to see the west really hit its stride in either becoming irrelevant, or learning to come down to earth and join the rest of humanity (without the levers of coercion- they’re never going back, and the west will never be trusted to develop them, ever) as equals- and as truly reformed, repentant, and thoroughly decolonized equals.

China and Russia aren’t functioning as imperialist powers. In fact, rather the opposite. And the way to fight the imperialist bloc- the methods they are using- socially, economically, diplomatically- are ways contrary to the very notion of imperialism and hegemony.

You said earlier that the US was “trying to force China and Russia together”- and here you explicitly state that the west is “trying to influence them, to become imperialist powers”- and that couldn’t be further from the truth. That’s complete and utter bullshit. Nonsense, garbage, and you should educate yourself on that mentality and also consider just how ridiculous that sounds. The west has no such plans for either Russia or China- rather, their nations are only on the menu (the Russians tried, this is where it led them- back to the global south, to anti-imperialism, to realizing their place is with Eurasia and not the “continent” of Europe and its paleskinned, mayo racists), and the increasing ties between them are to the west’s horror and what will undo the western imperialist bloc- but also, the notion that these nations- China and Russia, but also the rest of the global south- are having their path charted by the west, which is molding them to become its twisted afterimage- frankly exposes a deep, hopefully subconscious (but extant all the same) western, Eurocentric chauvinism wherein the colored and non-western peoples can’t truly think for themselves, and everything meaningful has already been devised by Europeans and westerners (like yourself) who will determine the path that “has” to be taken- that the actions of the global south right now- those of China, in its development unseen throughout history and built without imperialism, of Russia, which is joining hands with the anti-imperialist struggle in Africa and the MENA while they themselves fight encroachment and attempts at genocide and the balkanization of their nation at home, of Iran (flawed that it is) and the various nations amongst the anti-imperialist bloc, etc… are insufficient, that their revolutions are insufficient, that you- a western leftist (if you can be called that- I’m increasingly doubting you should be called that) have the real answers to their liberation, and how to progress past capitalism and imperialism as its highest stage and a world system- and that it comes in some nebulous, “purer” notion of a revolution- which frankly sounds like some anarkiddie nonsense.

China’s development is a revolution. Russia’s assistance to the various African anti-colonial states (and their own choice in partnering with Russia, to build a world that goes beyond imperialism, beyond the exploitation that has been all the west ever offered, to develop and pursue win-win cooperation- let’s not forget that this is their choice, to work with Russia, with China, with BRICS, and the world at large is ecstatic), the development of BRICS (even with the greatly diverse and flawed members as it may be- Indian Hindutvas, Saudi and Emirati petro-monarchies, Iranian state Islamism, the mess that is Egypt, Brazil which struggles with its own settler-colonial issues, Russia which is no Soviet Union, etc), the forging of ties amongst such disparate groups, overcoming the divide-and-conquer and small trivialities (small in contrast) that the west has constantly sought to emphasize and enflame, in order to take on the greatest contradiction, the most abhorrent one- imperialism- all of this is a revolution.

And, in case I can’t emphasize it enough- I’m going to copy-and-paste state it word-for-word again- ‘the forging of ties amongst such disparate groups, overcoming the divide-and-conquer and small trivialities (small in contrast) that the west has constantly sought to emphasize and enflame, in order to take on the greatest contradiction, the most abhorrent one- imperialism.’ Do you want to know what the west really proposes, its grand vision for the world, what the cursed western powers inflicted throughout their direct colonial rules, what they consistently support to this day in every corner of the earth, what they even maintain in some considerable level within their own imperial cores? It’s that divide-and-conquer mentality, a colonized (or colonizer) mentality through and through.

Blocs are not inherently imperialist; the Warsaw pact was not imperialist, and- if the non-aligned movement, or whatever other grouping, had unified in resistance to the west, it would have been imperialist either. Pan-Africanism, pan-Arabism, pan-indigenism, the collaboration of the global south, etc. is not imperialist. And frankly? If it takes a bloc to fight the west- if the west drives Russia, China, and the rest of the global south towards forming a bloc of resistance, as they are now (through their intolerable actions- genocide, constant warmongering, imperial arrogance and hubris and NOT some “master scheme to taint the resistance with the imperialist ideologies so they can ‘replace’ the west”) then so be it; it is through collaboration, through tangible and meaningful solidarity- and this is what solidarity is, if blocs be needed so be it- that the resistance shall succeed.

The rest of the world is charting their own path, and in what is to come ahead- in the destruction of imperialism as a world system, and in the framework that the global south is building- frameworks of cooperation, mutual development and support, of sovereignty, of mutual respect and dialogue- that is where the path towards socialism lies, in an environment conducive for all nations to chart their course towards it in their own unique ways. And that China, the world’s emerging economic superpower and a socialist state (within a socialist phase of development, a transitionary period wherein the forces of capital are harnessed, with strict proletarian oversight and control, to develop) is among this new multipolar order’s greatest champions, can only spell good things for socialist development ahead.

Even if the US adopts an America First policy (we all know this is just coded fascism), we know they’ll still perform covert operations illegally and against their supposed policy.

And of course, the imperialist bloc will always be malicious actors. The imperialist ideologies predominant within their societies, their institutions, and proliferated across the entire globe amongst countless compradors, can always be expected to act as such. But the rest of the world is moving past this- they are developing, such that they will be able to better resist this- through the education and awareness of their peoples to the necessity of the anti-colonial struggle and solidarity against the common enemy; through the development of these countries, to wean themselves away from the methods of coercion and subversion the west has always used to undermine them; through the building of relationships- into blocs if need be- that together can better resist imperialist encroachment.

The rest of the world is moving past the west. Past the imperialist world system, and the west is grasping at straws trying to force the genie back in the bottle. And they’ll try, certainly they’ll try with every terroristic, genocidal, nefarious means to undermine this development- and they’ll send covert (and overt) operations illegally as they always have and is the nature of their system- and increasingly, those operations will fail. They’ll send their devils, their dogs of empire, as they are doing right now in Ukraine, right now in Gaza, along the shores of Yemen, in Chad, Ethiopia, the D.R. Congo- and those dogs will increasingly die, like the scum they are. Sometimes the west will score wins- like in Argentina, Ecuador, Pakistan (with the overthrow of Imran Khan), the Philippines, etc… but the tide is turning, and these wins will be ever more precarious- as can be seen with all the states mentioned above, or with the contingent post-soviet states of the EU, etc… and sometimes, they will appear more terrible than before- like with NATO’s expansion into the treacherous Nordics (which have never actually been “neutral”), and their attempts to court India, or- like with the Abraham accords- but as seen with the last example, these schemes will increasingly fall apart, through the contradictions of empire and its resulting hubris, through the decline in the material conditions underpinning empire, etc.

As much as we clown on the Democrats and their supporters, it’s true that if the Democrats fail we will not have a liberal democracy.

Sorry (not sorry) to tell ya, but you already don’t have a liberal “democracy.” Red fascist or blue fascist, take your pick, or reject the system of fascism altogether. It’s not a “democracy,” and while the past two senile old white POTUSes have been bad for American PR, Obama himself was just as bad when you actually look at his actions on the ground, in domestic and foreign policy alike. And frankly, I’d argue Biden and the neocon gang are far more fascistic than Trump ever was, if not in token minority “rights” (temporary privileges, considering how easily they are disposed of or voided by the regime despite being called rights- and I say this as someone who is a racial minority, trans, etc) then absolutely in foreign and economic policy, and in the erosion of “liberal” “rights and freedoms” (but they paint it in a notably different way from Trump, talking about “fighting fascism/racism/anti-semitism/far right or left extremism/misinformation/protecting ‘democracy’/etc”).

If you want to know the truth, we are essentially going to have to repeat the work of SDS, the Black Panthers, and all the other post-Civil Rights activisist left-wing movements. Now, instead of the Russian Empire going down as an imperialist force in favor of the Communists, we will have to organize to make that happen in the US or the UK.

And sure, those movements will have to be repeated. But my point is also that this time around, it is not just the Russian empire that is in rapid decline- it is the entire imperialist bloc, and they are more precariously positioned than ever before (their foundations sundered, held afloat by exporting their inflation worldwide and trying to extort the world with the chips they have remaining), and the world is reaching such a point, where it can be said that it is developing beyond the imperialist bloc as-is.

this exact policy is also going to force China and Russia to be more agggressive, more competitive, and even form alliances and tighten up on separating their sphere of influence from that of “the West” or the US. This is very bad. This will push China to align more with the right-wing of the CPC. We don’t want that. Thankfully we have Xi Jingping as prevention, but I don’t trust whoever is going to succeed. It’s too shakey, too unpredictable.

And as I see it- why shouldn’t I want much of what you describe? Not just for China and Russia, but the entire global south. You describe it as “right-wing,” but words have meanings- what is “right-wing” about anti-imperialist alliance and development? Is this just some inherent fear and condemnation of “militarism” (even when it is for the clear purpose of defending against a blatant aggressor)? Military buildups and alliances do not equate to “right wing politics”- and frankly, economic development and even competition between states is also not the sole purview of right-wing politics. These things are a fact of life- and I fully embrace and cheer on their rapid development on these fronts, because the more the non-imperialist nations develop in this regard, the more we approach multipolarity and the end of hegemony to the western imperialist system.

Or did you think that China- or even for that matter, Russia- is going to imitate the west’s failed system? That’s clearly not what is underway. It’s a loser’s system, a system in its latest stages as the west is in now frankly even destroys more than it ever creates- a system which has hollowed out the once impressive (if wholly ill-gotten) imperial cores’ infrastructure, industries, their very spirit. Socialism can be competitive; leftism can be competitive; and it is through the dictatorship of the proletariat that China has developed in such leaps and bounds while safeguarding the revolution, and in particular the characteristics of the revolution which guided China away from the many pitfalls that befell other nations- the Soviets and India as key examples of what China’s condition would otherwise be.

What is Russia doing now, for instance? Do you think it is liberal economics which is allowing Russia to outproduce the entire west in Ukraine, or that the Russians are the “goose-stepping orcs” that the west paints them out to be, and that is unifying their war effort and morale? Why do you think Chinese and BRICS financing and cooperation is increasingly being chosen across the global south- because it is more extractive, more exploitative?

And- in regards to the “too shakey, too unpredictable” bit- while this is not complacency (as the rest of the world isn’t going to save us in the imperial cores, and we can’t count on that nor are we owed that, frankly rather the opposite if you think about it), at least in the sense that you may or may not have been calling into question the anti-imperialist bloc’s development and overall direction- I wholeheartedly disagree. The rest of the world is moving in the right direction (multipolarity, win-win cooperation, actual “rules-based” order, etc), and it’s a question of whether the imperialist bloc will succeed in their attempts to destroy this progress.

I still follow in my belief that we need fresh revolution. If Americans or the British can’t do it, there’s going to be some serious issues. It will be the equivalent of the German Revolution failing.

We (as in those of us in the imperial cores) need fresh revolution, yes. The rest of the world will determine their own path as they see fit, and if you ask me, by and large, for all that it is littered with flaws along the way, they’re headed in more than the right direction. The world doesn’t need the west to “reform themselves and save the day” otherwise though, they just need the west to get lost, to get out of the way of the rest of humanity (granted, I may have interpreted your tone and/or meaning somewhat wrong here, 50/50 on that). But I do agree otherwise- if the Americans or Europeans can’t do it (or the Brits, but truth is also the Brits are increasingly irrelevant- a wonderful statement, that) we’re going to see a world war and attempts by the imperialist bloc, at repeating and perhaps even eclipsing the fascist atrocities of the past century.

What damage, exactly, can TikTok be claimed to have done to society? Certainly not anything that Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Instagram, Youtube, or- what comes to mind as closest to TikTok in format if not sophistication, Vine, has not already done (and then some)

Is it so disastrous (or different from what came before) that now there are trending dance videos? Nevermind the fact that these things absolutely existed before. And is it so damaging, that short-form video content has become more popular? Frankly, what has TikTok revealed within western society, that did not exist before?

TikTok exists in other countries as well. What “irreparable damage” has been inflicted on the various Latin American, Asian, African, east European countries that have it? What makes TikTok so different? You know, Facebook in particular has been provably caught with electoral interference through systemic misinformation campaigns- within multiple countries, including the imperial core of the imperial cores itself, AmeriKKKa (Cambridge Analytica). It has actually been used to facilitate genocide in Myanmar (and I think a very strong case could be made about Meta and Alphabet facilitating it in Palestine as we speak). These AmeriKKKan social media sites/apps are also also all rife with “former” US alphabet agencies’ staff, it’s basically an open secret, and their services are, among other things, basically backdoors for Uncle Sam and the 5 Eyes to violate their users’ privacy, swoop them up in dragnets, etc… and their algorithms notoriously have a certain (right-wing) bent- or as they call it, the “alt-right pipeline”- and now, even as Meta and AIPAC lobbying has brought about what will be the disastrous move (for the US, not China) of outright trying to force a sale of TikTok despite its following American laws to the letter- what the rest of the world recognizes as extortion, and another example of the US cutting off its nose to spite China’s face (like with the seizures of Russian assets, the ““reparations”” being handed to Ukraine, the 100%+ tariffs on Chinese EVs/etc) it’s TikTok that is supposed to have done “irreparable damage?”

Interestingly enough, the key difference between TikTok and the other US alternatives is that- TikTok has, unlike pretty much all mainstream AmeriKKKan social media, actually allowed some vestiges of “freeze peach” and thus revealed to many the horrific atrocities the Pissraelis are committing. Can we call that “irreparable damage,” or rather the opposite?

Ireland is as hopeless a vassal state as anywhere else, yes, but at the very least they have not committed imperialism, and retain some considerable anti-imperialist sentiments with which they stand with the global south.

My point was that it is the only west European state that should even be considered, if at all- the thought that an institution based in the UK, France, Germany, any of the Benelux countries, the Nordics, or the (southwest European) Iberians or Italy can stand for anything remotely resembling “justice” or “human rights” is a farce, one which only could be topped by locating it in one of the various settler-colonial states whose very existence is a product of continuous genocide.

If Ireland were to reject all its ties to the western genocidaire bloc, and fully embrace its common cause with the global south instead, it would be a perfectly reasonable choice for an ICJ replacement, especially in a liberated northern Ireland. But the Netherlands, or any other west European country? Frankly, they could go truly communist, and embrace the global south in its entirety, and I don’t think they would be a good fit, not for centuries if not longer; their crimes are simply that significant that to place such an institution in such nations would be spitting in the face of all their victims and the entire non-western world.

I’d argue there are two reasons- the first is, that this is a product of all the contradictions of capitalism, which, particularly after Reaganomics and then the triumphalist “end of history” as the Soviet Union fell, reached a point wherein the beast began truly devouring itself- and all the foundations which it had built itself upon- at a pace greater than it could plunder back or reproduce in turn, and with ideological justifications and systemic corruption (ie. neoliberalism and the environment that enforces it- finance capitalism, the rentier-monopolist classes, etc) that have made recovery difficult if not nigh impossible without revolutionary change.

The second reason is that, simply put, barring genocide of the majority of the masses of the non-western world, this was the natural path of things- the global south, the colonized, far outnumber the west, and with the decadence, and also arrogance of the imperial cores, this decline was nigh inevitable as the rest of the world caught up and outpaced the west, and as deterrence and through it the ray of hope for independent powers and blocs emerged. The contradictions of capitalism and the empire prevented the actions needed for its final victory (if it were even possible); frankly if you ask me, the only way this victory could have been assured would have been if a thoroughly inhumane (and utterly monstrous, in a way that not even the worst genocidaires in history such as Hitler were) western leader, taking the logic of empire, would have undertaken Churchill’s proposed “Operation Unthinkable” before the Soviets had developed their own nukes- and they would have not only nuked the Soviets, but used nukes, biological and chemical weapons, etc, etc. upon the entire rest of humanity to destroy even the seeds of hope and resistance- and even then it would likely not be enough, as the contradictions of capital and the empire are such that the bulk of their labor and extracted resources are from the periphery, and even of those truly and purely from the imperial cores, such a horror would inspire resistance, whether out of moral principles, the awareness that those within the core would increasingly be next, or the pragmatism of not wanting to rule over ashes.

China alone is already more populous than the entire west combined. Without a constant (and by necessity- explicitly genocidal) suppression, this development- where China would retake the place it has held for the vast majority of human history- was inevitable; even just the Chinese people alone can produce more than the west, innovate more than the west, and frankly for that matter they have a superior (indigenous) civilization (well, frankly I’d argue that every non-western civilization is inherently far superior in this aspect, so it’s not just China) which is not founded upon the imperialist divide-and-conquer contradictions that exist even within the imperial cores- the settler-states most obviously, but also even England proper, France, Germany, the Netherlands, etc… the empire, and capitalism, is founded on a kind of chaos and conflict- the eternal suppression and beating down of the lower classes, the eternal search for the “other” to vilify and scapegoat for the flaws in the system, and the eternal race to the bottom, with whatever underhanded or destructive means necessary to gain a quick buck. Without the global south to plunder, and to vent its frustrations and contradictions upon, the west would have collapsed long ago, in the same sense that Nazi Germany (as an embodiment of the true nature of the west), in a triumphal world where they had eradicated all the “untermensch” and established a “pure ‘Aryan’ society” across the globe- would have eaten itself alive. If you ask me, the western system is such that not even a “virgin earth” all to themselves, could be enough to satiate even a capitalist nation as small as the Netherlands (nevermind the fact that being cut off of the bulk of the world’s labor which it depends upon would be disastrous for it).

Competent imperialist could- and did- try to sustain the empire, further still. They co-opted and cannibalized new contenders- like Japan and Germany- successfully carved apart and mangled all the true (non-western) civilizations of the world- the Russian/Soviet, Chinese, Islamic, South Asian, West African, etc. civilizations. But the nature of the contradictions inevitably led to their arrogance, and seeking to extract more, more, and more from the global south and the working class, to the point where they exported even the foundations their empires were built upon (industrial production) to the colonized with the expectations the colonized, the “lesser slaves” could never build up against them- and better than they ever had- in turn; and to the point those nations that could have been co-opted, post-Soviet Russia in specific, but also countless other nations- the gulf Arabs, the south Asian states, nations across Latin America, Africa, Asia- was spurned rather than added into the fold without any consideration as to the basic dignity and volition it, and all of humanity, had to not simply go quietly into the dark, to not accept being carved apart, piece by piece, and eternally plundered.

Imperialism within the cores will not collapse so easily, yes. And I agree with your general sentiments as well, in regards to the necessity for revolution within the cores and the dangers of complacency. But imperialism as a global system is absolutely going to collapse, and is visibly doing so- economically, militarily, technologically, socially, etc. all the pillars that have imposed imperialism upon much of the world are falling.

The west is trying- and increasingly, failing- to maintain its empire abroad now. And even within the imperial cores, they’re certainly not “doing just fine,” and calling the US the “most stable” is also a joke. And while the western elites will surely turn their domestic crises towards their own advantage, the fact is that the walls are closing in, and the foundations of even the imperial cores are genuinely eroding- demographically, ideologically, economically, etc- and the west is, in a very real sense, cutting itself off, bit by bit, from the rest of the world (good riddance in that regard to the west, even though I live in it).

The west is not self-sufficient, and- frankly, it is not competitive, not at anything much anymore other than slander (and even that is in rapid decline) and genocide- and even then, as can be seen with the current Ukraine conflict, but also with the resistance against the Zionist occupiers, in Yemen, in Iran, in Syria and Lebanon and Iraq, and in Palestine itself- they can’t win, and ultimately they can’t and won’t even break even. The empire is bleeding itself dry, and yet it is being outproduced- and in more cost efficient ways. Just Russia alone is outproducing and outgunning all of NATO; when and if China is added to the mix, the west will truly have no hope whatsoever.

The anti-imperialist bloc today is more advanced, more stable (in regards to the core 2 nations leading the charge- China and Russia), more capable and determined in every sense, than the west. The west has essentially, barring some nigh-impossible changes (basically China/Russia going belly-up and submitting despite holding all the chips) already lost; now all that is left is to see how much destruction and suffering they will get away with inflicting on the world before they are done, in that sense (the answer of course though being- a lot, with the very real possibility of even the complete annihilation of our species in the process). For much of the world outside the cores- though the process will take decades- the era of western savagery and infestation is over; the light at the end of the tunnel is in a very real and tangible sense to be seen, even if there is definitely much suffering and danger ahead getting there. And for the imperial cores- needless to say, the empire will either increasingly starve and cannibalize itself, or fall to revolution as the hunger sets in, or- as it certainly seems to be doing now- attempt to go out with a bang, to try to re-establish the empire by holding the world hostage in a final orgy of violence and bloodshed.

While it’s “better than expected,” I agree, it’s utterly spineless (especially considering the accusations leveled at the Hamas leaders, compared to what Netanyahu and Yoav are facing).

Someday, hopefully someday soon, the ICJ will be utterly defunct for its many hypocrisies. In the multipolar world ahead, I’d even go so far as to say that there should be no international courts whatsoever in western Europe, outside of perhaps Ireland- the west does not represent justice (rather the opposite), and their ongoing crimes as well as those of their ancestors should hang over their heads like a mark of shame (in regards to international relations) warranting further scrutiny and inherent distrust for centuries to come, if not millennia.

It would be like Mad Max combined with Nazi Germany’s worst atrocities, or perhaps better compared to the worst horrors of the Ustase. But if you ask me, just that fact alone- that the US and other Anglo settler-colonial societies would certainly spiral to such depravity when given an excuse, and that the minorities and in particular the rightful indigenous peoples of the land live constantly with their lives hostage (and with “quiet” genocides continually being maintained to this day) is reason enough for why the rest of the world will likely have to take a role in decolonizing the Anglosphere, one way or another (presently, while it’s not indigenism which would be better, I’d argue the foundations for such a process are being built, somewhat, with the demographic decline of white Anglos in these countries).

To America, that is- the rest of the world would be certainly scarred too, but the Yanks would be going down. And even if things got as bad as what was done to North Korea by the Americans- frankly I can’t claim I’d be overly saddened, so long as the indigenous, minority, and leftist, anti-imperialist communities were left largely alone.

This is the “western civilization” imperialists have always brought. Shame on these devils and all who support them (also devils)… if there were a hell, even that would not be punishment enough for their crimes.

By the looks of things so far, the US is deadset on dragging the rest of its puppets down with it. So I’d say- things don’t look good for the “international community” (and good riddance, even as someone who lives in one such imperial core myself)

If it played out, I imagine the Dutch govt. would cave like the good little puppets they are, and try to claim the US was “invited” or something if they couldn’t cover it up.