I guess if you’re standing on the deck of a naval vessel, it doesn’t matter much what you’re wearing

Not even in the slightest

Nobody says we must maintain some “pure” system. For an already existing example, passing a constitutional amendment is far, far more difficult than regular legislation. Is that undemocratic? By the most “pure” definition, yes. It’s far from just letting everything be decided by 50+1 popular vote. Or hell, even the fact that we have representatives we elect instead of using direct democracy for everything.

Limiting democracy doesn’t mean just installing a dictator or something. It can be as simple as placing some issues beyond the reach of majoritatian whims. I never see any of the people crying about democracy upset that their free speech isn’t under question of majoritatian will.

OK, and? Democracy isn’t some god to worship. If democracy can’t achieve good results, is it not reasonable to view alternative systems as a next choice?

If the enemy thinks your ship is already sunk, they’re less likely to try and sink it

Cancel culture is not just literally the concept of something being canceled, just like it’s not cancel culture when you cancel a hotel reservation

Is this specifically a reference to gate, or have we just accidentally come to the exact same end point independently?

Hell yeah I’m voting for the guys giving me paid leave for free

Convieniently leaving out that we just get out pay after the furlough is over anyway

Feel free to point me in the direction of some communities open to discussion then if you’d like to prove me wrong.

So you’re being genuine when you’ve told people elsewhere on this thread to kill themselves?

Yes. I believe the world would be better off without them. Disagree if you like, nothing wrong with that, but im of the opinion that fixing our problems in any real capacity is going to require that we stop putting the focus on being polite and proper.

I’m not concerned about your, or their, comment history. I’m concerned with this specific thread, since you’ve said numerous time that they’ve lied specially in this thread.

Sure, but the primary axis of his lies regard his claims about me based on my history. Primarily, that I have not made this post, or any for that matter, in good faith.

I mean, I can completely understand why people think that those that voted for Trump are bigots

If being a bigot is just a matter of opinion, what’s the point in calling people it at all? Might as well be just another insult if the criteria is just whatever someone feels like at the moment, especially if the person in question doesn’t actually meet the proper definition of the term.

I don’t think about them particularly often.

Lmao please provide a shred of proof for your insane accusations about how rfk has been a psyop for decades

Well, his very first comment was a lie. I’m not here for people to say I’m right. He then followed up by saying my comments are not in good faith, another lie. He follow up by doubling down on these false claims. Elsewhere in his history (which is fair game since he decided to attack mine), he claimed that conservatives don’t legitimately hold any of their positions and are just making excuses for bigotry, which de doubled down on here. He claimed that I’m a bigot, which is false. His response to you is just a bunch of dishonest crap.

The repeal of Roe v Wade

Which has nothing to do with the topic. The fundamental question of the abortion debate is one of life and responsibility. Not the spam CNN feeds you about sexism.

Endorsement of a president who has had multiple sexual assault suits against him

Irrelevant, not a policy position

The GOPs refusal to adhere to court orders about redistributing Alabama because it’s gerrymandered to have the majority of the black population in one district. This minimizes the representation they’re able to have.

The court is not an automatic source of justice. Frequently the opposite.

Florida trying to ban healthcare for adults because they’re afraid of trans people

Isn’t happening

The Supreme Court openly saying that gay marriage is something the conservative justices would like to revisit

Because it was an insanely flimsy case on crappy logic.

There’s countless more examples of the party endorsing and supporting racist, homophobic, transphobic and sexist policies.

If they’re as bad as your last set of examples, don’t bother

I entered this thread willing to have an honest conversation

No you didn’t. You opened with a brazen lie about me, so I returned the favor and checked your history, which, as it turns out, is full of brain dead rhetoric about how much you think nobody can validity hold opinions you don’t share

Sorry I’m honest, unlike you

Once again, objectively false. The party does not support those ideals.

Lmao glad you find humor in my refusal to fall for your crap

It would be far too much effort to copy every single life o considering I already called each and every lie out directly