You’d be better off using an upscaling AI to do this rather than an AI that tries to reinterpret what’s already there. Go grab a pirated copy of Topaz Video Enhance and you’ll see what I mean.

Doesn’t work on mobile :(

This is the first time I’ve ever seen positive sentiment for Google+ online.

I come from early YouTube where it was forced upon us from above, so I’m genuinely curious as to what positives you see in it.

It can’t be that it’s defederated because I was using an account local to that instance. Plus, loading the community on a browser works fine.

This, plus the ability to open the main post and scroll sideways to view images in the post (as if they were galleries). That would be fantastic!

I went full Firefox a few weeks ago. It’s been mostly fine but there are a few weird hitches that Chromium-based browsers just don’t have. So because of that I currently think Brave is a good recommendation for most people.

Here’s a sneak peek of the progress for the next version of the LoRA:

I think the colours are better and everything is just a bit more consistent, but there is still more work to be done.

I want to! Even if it’s just a little, I think adding context makes things like this so much better. Plus it gives you the opportunity to continue that story later if people like it!

Yes! I asked her before I started. I may be a degenerate, but I’m not that bad.

Adding the word “scientific” to your point doesn’t make it more believable.

In fact, it detracts from your point by making you sound like you don’t know how to use the word.

It’s engagement farming.

Notice how they’re all questions? The way this works on other social media is you ask something in a community that most people will have an opinion on, but frame it opposite to that opinion (e.g. the tiny tits question), and that will give you a bunch of engagement through comments which tells the algorithm the post is more interesting so it pushes the post higher to raise visibility to keep people on the site longer to view more ads.

The thing is, Lemmy does not have an algorithm like that, so it’s pointless to do here.

Pringles :)

I remember seeing this format before, but with Jibril from NGNL:

Or just… Use your eyes to tell roughly how old they are. No point fussing over details when it’s not even a real person.