I got most hours in pokemon silver and blue. I have played only Gen 1-5 but still like the gen 2 and its sprites.
It amazes me how much the devs were able to get out of gameboy hardware.

I forgot to mention that the video shows 5pp for Venom Bite, but decided to change it since to more closely match thunder.
Old: 5pp 120 power, 85% accuracy, 33% chance to poison
New: 10pp 120 power, 70% accuracy, 30% chance to poison

I decided to lower the accuracy because poison status already deals 1/8th the damage each turn and Fire blast which accuracy is 85% has only 10% effect chance. The lower accuracy then balanced by the power point increase.

Comparison to gen 2 moves:
Fire blast: 5 pp, 120 power, 85% acc, 10% effect
Hydro pump: 5 pp, 120 power, 80% acc, --% effect
Thunder: 10 pp, 120 power, 70% acc, 30% effect

I think I got the idea, I just now updated the original post and added a footnote how I understood the Brahmagupta–Fibonacci identity.
I have only surface knowledge about imaginary numbers, but I have noticed sum of two squares being also referred as Gaussian integers.
There’s definitely a lot of material to read about relating both Gaussian integers and Pythagorean triples, that I can gain intuition how all of these relations work out. I much appreciate the help!

Thank you for the answer! I have to take deeper look into that.
It’s rather interesting how seemingly two different sum components share factors. It’s like finding pi from seemingly unrelated series.

After some thinking I came up with this.
Conjecture:

N² = a²+b²
N  = c²+d²

a = 2*c*d
b = d²-c²

integers a,b,c,d>0

For any integer N that can be expressed as both N²=a²+b² and N=c²+d², the relationship a=2*c*d holds.  

Is it enough proof just to show that the above equations are true when substituting them to N² and N equations?
If a = 2*c*d then one leg of the Pythagorean triple definitely contains c and d factors and ‘2’. This might be related to Pythagorean triple parametrization.

I fixed the flawed ChatGPT counterexample finder script and now it gives this list of all numbers including composites which don’t follow these rules, such as 58. Here’s sub-sequence of A004431 numbers that don’t follow the rules:

Numbers which neither Pythagorean side is divisible by 4
Composites: [10, 26, 34, 50, 58, 74, 82, 90, 106, 122, 130, 146, 170, 178...]
This is identical to Sums of two distinct odd squares A339977 which makes sense as if c,d>1 and odd, they must be 3 or bigger hence their factors are missing the extra ‘2’, unlike primes where one of c or d is always even.
Even composites appear to follow a=2*c*d relation. The prime pythagorean side divisibility by 4 appears to be just a side effect.

That’s what 65dos Taipei music video looks like, though that was released 2013 https://youtu.be/06ObT5yIIx8

I’ve been using lemmy almost a year now and it has been fairly smooth. But I still get logged out every time I refresh some community pages which is strange.

So it’s illegal to die poor

I agree with the biological definition, “organism that can survive as an individual”. Even if the fetus has a parasitic relation, it is capable of developing all functions to fit the full definition.
There are other definitions of ‘life’ and anyone is free to believe either way, but the more subjective question is: When does the fetus become a person?

Same thing with alcohol prohibition. People are going to break the law, legal or not. The US is said to be the freedom land, but women can’t have autonomy over their bodies.
What I gathered is that 70% of the US congress is men, so it’s not their freedom that they sacrifice.  
Christian values are important to some voters, so politicians can gain free points by promising anti-abortion laws.  
The politicians who make such decisions think one term at a time and disregard the consequences as long as it doesn’t affect them. If they actually cared, they would also advocate for childcare benefits.

I just have it in muscle memory to know which way soda bottle cap tightens

I believe abortion is killing, but it only becomes murder by definition if abortion is outlawed. The literal definition is “the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another.”
The fetus won’t have cerebral cortex till +12 weeks; no consciousness. So it wouldn’t be much different than killing a plant or bacteria. It’s debated when it becomes a human.
Yes, I justify murder as it will likely reduce the suffering. Thus, I am a monster in Christians eyes.

It looks bad for the advertisers to use strong words or take a stance.

That was a good watch, I can see binary view being at least part of the problem. I did think that religion might be part of the reason for some laws, but somehow didn’t realize how big. And the video had many other good points worth of the watch.

How did i get chills listening a gif?

I genuinely thought symlinking these files was standard because how many people I have seen suggesting it. I have had this issue so many times when I needed to that one program updated but there’s no newer libraries in AUR. Surprisingly, I haven’t had issues and I’ve been doing this past 5 years on my personal system. So I guess I consider compiling from source next time.

It did brush my mind as I’m still baffled about some abortion laws even if there’s no brain development. But if it was an egg, it would be hard to enforce it and some eggs aren’t fertilized. I bet someone would try to outlaw having a miscarriage if they could.

The more you know. So it could be more likely that humans sat on their eggs to keep them warm, or they would have been limited to tropical climates. Humans would have evolved very differently regardless.

Yes, my parents used to have chickens. It’s unlikely that the incubation period would be 9 months and being oviparous has It’s own challenges. If humans did evolve that route I’d imagine that we’d have overcome most of the issues. Dinosaurs being one example, it’s possible humans would be cold blooded and have learned the joy of regurgitation. It comes down to speculation whether human like intelligence could have evolved with these limitations.

Thanks!