IceWallowCum [he/him]

  • 2 Posts
  • 169 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 26th, 2020

help-circle
  • nowhere in my comment says “don’t read Marx”. It is rude for anyone on hexbear to assume that a fellow hexbear user would be saying “don’t read Marx”.

    Yeah, that is not what I said at all. I just said your comment could be interpreted as that by a random person reading. In fact, I assumed you are not saying that, which is why I took the time to add that at the end.

    I think it’s toxic for people to interpret comments as if they have malice

    Which is exactly what you’re doing right now


  • Kind of a side note, but I think it’s important to point out that while they didn’t write about intellectual property and automation, Marx clearly defined the basis from which they came to develop, and that is essential to understanding both.

    Laws are a manifestation of property relations, not the other way around. Intellectual property is a specific manifestation of the general private property that dictates capitalism. The phenomenon of music as commodity wasn’t as developed then, but the analysis of private property in general, which then dictates the specific forms of property, is all there.

    Regarding automation, Capital Vol. 1 deals with the atomization of the work process leading into increasingly simplistic and specific actions, which lead to the creation of increasingly specific tools as we get to understand the processes better through practice and science. While this isn’t specifically about automation, it defines the process through which human development managed to substitute physical labor for machine labor over time. Machines were a specific form of it, automation is another, and AI might be a new one (that is particularly applicable to creative labor/commodity production).

    I’m only pointing this out because your comment may read like “don’t bother reading Marx to understand these phenomena” for some











  • Genuine questions, I’m still a baby Marxist.

    by selling their goods and services (built with the help of China) to the US!

    … which flood american markets with cheap, quality products and drowns America’s own productive capacity, right? Isn’t that precisely how america lost its means of production? American capital is even trying to prevent this on the electric vehicle sphere.

    I understand that production and consumption are moments of a whole, so the dependence goes both ways - you can’t keep producing unless someone is buying. I also understand that all this is somewhat secondary to the problem underlying the whole thing:

    If you don’t accumulate dollars, you can’t import food and fuel

    Do the major food/fuel-producing countries have dominance over their own production and commerce? Where do their dollars go next?