Well see, now you’re actually making good points that do have some value to them.

First and foremost, that a concept built by a bunch of students, it doesn’t have to be perfect, it’s goal is to prove the concept. The first ever built plain that actually worked wasn’t perfect - does that mean people who built it should’ve abandoned it?

Not everything has to be equally viable in all circumstance. Building made in regions with high seismic activity are built in a way to account for that activity. If one lives on a flatland with zero seismic activity - those extra resources spent on a building might seem worthless to such a person, but they are not and if said person says that "they can just build normal houses there, what’s the issue? " then the person is ignorant (and also a complete prick).

As to the car failing as an SUV - I haven’t seen where they driven during the test run so I can’t say whether or not it failed. They got from the point A to the point B so if I had to guess I say it worked fine.

P. S. I’m not sure why I’m wasting my time on this with that attitude of yours with prove me wrong and such… Yeah, whatever

Oh, no, the downvotes have nothing to do with where you live yet they have something to do with you being arrogant and ignorant

Can’t spell “estadunidense” without “dense”, can you?

You don’t have to listen to the dead, have you? Just sayin’

Can you not just create a local social club account and use it to save your game progress? Iirc that how it supposed to work at least

It’s plastic not wax

Well to miss something you need, in the first place, aim at it and I don’t know about you but all I can aim at blindfolded is my own feet

So a cube? 0.0 and 1.1 are on a top side and 0.1 and 1.0 are on a bottom side so every line is a diagonal of a cube’s face

And to add on the “the second the market opens” part - landlords can buy houses even before they are fully built and liveable which is not really an option for a person with no house because such an investment leaves you with no place to live and no money (mostly).

I’m not saying all landlords do so but what you described happens quite often. Landlords buy a property when they already have a place to live in and then rent out said property to someone who has none. And now said someone can’t own a property because there’s none on the market as all are bought out so all what is left to do for those people is to rent. It’s an oversimplification of course and there’s a lot of nuance to it but the general message still stands - if a person with a house buys another house to rent it out then one less house remains to be bought for people with no house.

So… Which news website has good news again?

So how do you fit 27 beers inside yourself?

Exactly what I thought about

I’d go with B for obvious reasons

Well, that’s an absolute exception and no one should even consider such an occurrence to be a new standard ever

/s (just in case)

In the end the people who ran the hegemony of cable TV just got their hands on the TV streaming services and turned it into the hegemony of TV streaming service.

Nothing have changed the goals people at the top had - they just needed time to adapt

Thanks! P. S. Also now I feel stupid lol

Oh, so it’s there, thanks!

So uhm… Does it have an inbox for replies? I tried to find it and failed miserably

You need to help yourself if you’re for real