I finally have some time to take a look at your question. There’s that part like you said, that zionism supposes that no matter where Jews live they will always be alien. And also that they “need” to have their own ethnostate as they could never integrate with anyone else. In no uncertain terms, Zionism says that Jews are predisposed to committing genocide.

The first argument is exactly what Hitler and tbh many (non-Jewish) people before him believed in, he didn’t come out of nowhere. The second is what eugenicists believe.

Some people don’t like the comparison but it’s becoming more mainstream as the world sees what ‘Israel’ is doing in Gaza. Zionism shares a lot of traits with fascism, to the point we could probably call zionism a form of fascism. Zionism didn’t come out of nowhere either, it shares a history with the rise of proto-fascism of the late 19th century.

The circle is complete. Hinkle gains exposure, people who were not gonna believe Assad was innocent anyway will just shake their head and reinforce their anti communist beliefs meanwhile impressionable kids are going to look him up like they did Tate instead of actually getting into Marxism.

Everyone wants to gravitate around hinkle (haz, despite making hinkle, now laps up at his bowl!) because he has the audience and he keeps getting more popular every time one of those convenient articles comes out. There’s nothing unexplainable about it.

All according to the CIAs plan.

full circle

Just wait a week and make an account again

The pedophile Dershowitz also believes this, but he extends it to all Palestinians. He wouldn’t extend the same definition to ‘Israelis’, however.

As he is on the side that has the power, he can get away with weasel words. He can legitimately say “of course I don’t want children to be killed” while internally cackling every time a video of dead Palestinian children pops up on his feed.

He can do this because the child-killing will continue no matter his opinion of it. He knows it will, even if he was somehow influential within ‘Israeli’ politics (he probably is with all the pedos they harbor). He could publicly tell Nethanyahu “Stop killing children”, and they would look at each other with a smile on their face, knowing that the public eats it up.

As the oppressed side and being on the side of the oppressed, we have to be much more direct with our arguments. I don’t believe any settler is innocent, and saying this instantly puts me at odds with the child rapist Dershowitz who said “sure some people in Gaza are innocent, why not”. However in this case, I was directly rewriting his article to make a point, and thus the line that some settlers might be innocent was included as it was part of the original article (although, from the further arguments in the article, I was actually arguing they can not be innocent, much like Dershowitz was subtly saying the same about Gazans).

I plan on expanding this argument if I end up writing my own article based on the title of this one, which is looking increasingly more likely.

This isn’t a huge thing in the grand scheme of things but I see Pluto has been talking about making his own wiki on fear of being banned or having his edits reverted a few times already and I figure I could set the record straight on how we (ProleWiki) operate.

We don’t ask anyone the party they are in, if any. This is something they are free to share, but don’t have to. We also know which is Pluto’s account on the wiki and have not banned him or taken any action against him. He’s free to log in and edit any time he wants.

On CPUSA, the page is ‘protected’ (not in the same way wikipedia pages are protected) because we have essentially one editor doing the writing on it. This happens with several other pages, when we have someone who has proficiency in the topic, they kind of become the page’s manager and should be notified of big edits, either before or after the fact. (Before- so they can help with the edits, and after- so they can review it and see if they want to change anything). Change in this case doesn’t necessarily mean removing, it can mean adding content, pictures, or even reordering or rewriting parts of the article to include the different edits that were made.

On this basis, whether Pluto’s edits on the CPUSA page would go through or be reverted can only be determined once he makes an edit, which has yet to happen. So there’s no way to say what would happen to his edits. I should note he has not approached us either to make edits or discuss the changes he wants to bring to (any) page, which is totally fine, but it is one reason I’m making this comment now, to clarify that we don’t bully editors off the platform or anything lol.

They put windows in inside rooms (that gives to another room) to let light in and for aeration that’s it that’s the purpose

Yeah right. They’ve been bombing Rafah for a few days now, even at night, and there’s tons of videos of dead kids surfacing already. Never trust what the zionist state says

Did you not check where you are, lib

On Authority is the one we send because we want to be nice. We could just as well send Socialism or Anarchism from Stalin.

They keep saying to ignore On Authority because they don’t have any arguments against it

There is no scale between the Flood of al-Aqsa and what ‘Israel’ has been doing to Gaza for the past 7 months.

a- 600 ‘Israelis’ were killed by the Resistance on October 7. Up to 200,000 – 10% of the population in Gaza – have been killed so far since then. The remaining 600 that ‘Israel’ claims died were either killed by their own country, or simply do not exist. The last toll that I heard of was between 800 to 1000.

b- October 7 killed and made prisoners of soldiers. They were not “kidnapped” and held for ransom, they are POWs. Because all of them were soldiers. ‘Israel’ put them in harm’s way by having conscription laws and regardless, if you are a soldier of the colonial project, you should expect your service is not going to happen peacefully.

c- ‘Israel’ has been bombing and starving the POWs in Gaza exactly because they are such important bargaining chips. Some years back they released thousands of Palestinians held in occupation prisons for one soldier.

d- don’t care didn’t ask tbh is what I would tell them. If they have the humanity to worry about settlers they have the humanity to worry about Palestinians. Do they also cry on the day Hitler killed himself and worship an altar they have of him?

There is simply no rational way ‘Israel’ comes out ahead when looking at the facts. Loyalty in a colony is first given to the colony before it is given to your fellow settlers. If they refuse to see this, they simply don’t want to see things as they are and will remain a settler.

Nice strawman have you ever talked to one of us

I think the first question above “will they deploy nukes” is against whom?

Nuking themselves? Settlers are privileged, they’ll want to go back to that privileged life.

Nuking neighboring countries? That’s just opening them up to retaliation from other nuclear powers.

Nuking Palestinian territories? I’m not sure they’ll be able to do that without at least the fallout hitting them back.

This is true

I think that one was remote detonated. It exploded at the perfect moment to do maximum damage.

In the video you see the explosion, then the guy going down a few seconds later.

It’s difficult to define it properly because they themselves have no coherent politics.

Hinkle is almost certainly an op. Larouche himself was likely a fed – he liked to deride his opponents as feds, but almost assuredly had contracts with the CIA and FBI to provide them with intel. The Schiller institute was good at doing that in the 70s-90s.

Hinkle has a strange public upbringing; he was close to some political figures (especially Tulsi Gabbard, who is the commander of a battalion in the US Army Civil Affairs & Psychological Operations) as a senior in high school. Keep in mind he’s only 24 today.

Next he emerges and gets boosted not once, but twice by the Zionist entity, each them getting him tons of followers. His entire brand is about repeating what others have said, stealing their words and repackaging them as his own analysis or news. I can’t count the number of tweets he’s stolen from other people lol.

There’s more to it but I don’t remember all of it, there’s an account on Twitter that tracks him pretty consistently: https://twitter.com/jonnysocialism

The last few years of patsocism evolving show this is correct. I made the observation in 2022 already; all they have to show for their supposed vanguard strand of marxism is twitch streamers and twitter accounts. Social-democrats have done it already and they do it better on breadtube.

2 years later, and 4-5 years of patsocism existing, and they are only entrenching themselves further in this dead-end (well, organizational dead-end; I’m sure it pays off quite well for their bank accounts). Their fans are mostly 13-15 year olds, and patsocs are now further diluting marxism, further vulgarizing it so that it only looks a certain way, regardless of context or deeper meaning. They take quotes and excerpts out of context, carefully cropping the parts that precede or follow it, to present a certain reading of marxism that is simply about buzzwords. It’s only about hitting the right words for them.