ChestRockwell [comrade/them, any]

  • 13 Posts
  • 200 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 29th, 2020

help-circle

















  • the opportunity he had to solidify the humanization of Shylock and the injustice he faced but no that was a comedy and yes audiences of his time thought it was joyous that Shylock lost his livelihood

    I assume you’ve read Marlowe’s Jew of Malta, at once 1000x more horrible but also more radical since it’s a tragedy and not a comedy.

    And yeah bardolotry is cringe and I feel ppl that actually study Shakey nowadays are way less prone to it (though it’s still there). If nothing else, there’s a deep Marxist tradition in the academy now that pushes back on great man theory.

    Say what you will about the new historicisists, they gave us that at least


  • Oh yeah the regime propaganda is an issue, and we can never fully “absolve” any artist of the time for their monarchist propaganda.

    Of course Dollimore’s Radical Tragedy is a good thing to keep in mind here - thanks to the existence of the state censor, the degree one could radically oppose monarchy was circumscribed by the conditions of artistic production. You can do a Richard II and present Bolingbroke as politicking (casting doubt on Tudor and later Stuart ideology about divine right in the process), but unfortunately the peasant uprisings are always dealt as if they are beyond the pale and the most you might get is some good rhetoric from their leaders.

    But we can’t forget this was all produced under a state censor (indeed we should emphasize it!) since it shows the limits of imagination imposed on Shakespeare, and if you’re into his “genius” then you can point to the radical elements he did include in spite of this regime.

    However I really don’t think he’s more than a great mixtape artist, mashing up good bits in pleasing ways. He was an artist for the people, and that’s the thing worth celebrating.


  • Michael Bay movies of the Renaissance

    Oh come-on, he was more of a Tarantino. Remixer of other more artistic playwrights to make mass culture.

    Also equally purient and into the lowbrow. Which is part of why he’s notable, he was the first real “pop” culture that was made for all classes, rather than just either aristocracy or peasants/tradesmen (i.e. medieval cycle dramas were for the later, the poetry the former).