No worries. The music contents were so appalling that I had to remove it to be sure it didn’t violate Rule 2 even if the actual video context was a critique.
No worries. The music contents were so appalling that I had to remove it to be sure it didn’t violate Rule 2 even if the actual video context was a critique.
Super easy. I had a post-op infection that prescription antibiotics cleared up np.
Don’t consider it easily reversible. The doctors made it clear there’s no guarantee
It’s not even that they “can’t” fund their own cleanup. The put down a cleaning deposit before operations begin and just walk away when the cleanup costs more than they originally put down.
I’d say they give the finger while walking but they need their hands to count their profits
You’ve already proven my point. No need to keep piling on evidence. You can just stop and reflect now on anything you’re unclear about as it’s all a simple re-read.
This is all a blatant attempt to rile up the Right. They know this BS is unconstitutional and start the crap just in time for the inevitable court cases to strike then down around voting time. It’s all about getting that outrage boiling
Thank you for proving my point
Because the issue isn’t racist depictions. It’s a lack of education and a focus on intolerance instead of actually employing the sympathy you are demanding. Nobody is arguing the word or imagery is fundamentally racist in origin. We’re saying they honestly don’t know about that so need education. That’s the context you are ignoring to go on your black knight crusade.
You are the exact opposite of what the Peace Corps is asking their members to be. Hear the offensive word and you go on a rage fueled violent rant about how racist they are being instead of taking a deep breathe, looking at the situation and realizing they only use the word because it is the only one they know. Simply taking the time to inform them of how hurtful the word/imagery is without being a salty bitch about it is how fences are mended.
I worked with Ukrainian immigrants decades ago and found them all to be extremely easy to converse with. They do almost all the work for you and their sense of humour is top notch. TBH you really could ask that question and they’d laugh, make some quip, share their sandwich and next thing you know you’re having dinner at their place tomorrow.
Apparently there is because the post clearly states that there is a possibility a volunteer might hear that word but it not be intentionally racist. You’re completely ignoring that half the message is ‘evaluate and determine if it is ignorance or racism’.
Thank you. This should have been a top comment as it needs more direct attention.
Way to contribute to the conversation there champ. Here’s your sign.
Pepperidge Farms remembers
Best I could find, myself not being fluent in Russian, is this human rights/legal organization still operating in Russia proper which describes the conviction as a result of delivering homemade fliers saying ‘do we really need this kind of President’.
By all means, reveal the evidence that was presented which you claim is being suppressed. I have no problems admitting I’m wrong in the face of substantiated evidence.
no scrap of evidence for this was produced.
The problem is escalation. You fire your shots in self defence, they back off an extra 50’ and call in a “shots fired, officer needs assistance” call and suddenly 4 APCs, 20 cruisers and 2 helicopters are surrounding you. Cue sounds of 50 cal freedom suppressors being fired. And because you shot at them even though by the time its all over your body looks like a pile of spaghetti the shooting will be justified with barely a hearing involved.
Because selling a few observation drones during the off years is more than made up for by bombing Iranian terrorist leaders and damage to Shahed production facilities (the far more dangerous 3rd party contribution).
The lesser of 2 evils…
The paper doesn’t even prove that they are healthier due to a greater sense of personal responsibility. It only theorizes this sense of personal responsibility is a possible cause. As others have pointed out the study results could be explained simply by picking conservatives that are upperclass and have more time/energy/money to spend on being healthy.