Hell yeah my candidate isn’t fascist, YOUR candidate is fascist!
Hell yeah my candidate isn’t fascist, YOUR candidate is fascist!
I have several friends in France. Immigration is a big part of why they are voting conservative.
Lemmy isn’t representative of the US. If you consumed any media outside your bubble you’d see that.
Funny, that’s what I think about all the people clutching their pearls crying democracy is dead because of this ruling.
Never once have I said I’m for this.
Based on the incredible hyperbole written in the dissent. Legal expert turned partisan hack quite quickly when they start talking about assassinations.
The dissent said the president can now assassinate someone. The president enjoys no such authority, and therefore, the dissent must be discarded as not a serious opinion.
The dissent is in bad faith and should be discarded. The president enjoys no authority to assassinate anyone and therefore enjoys no immunity for doing so. The dissent is not serious and should be treated as such.
You truly believe the court gave full immunity for all things don’t you? You must have missed the part where it’s only for actions carrying out functions of the constitution. Everything else enjoys no such privilege. If a president commits a crime it is not protected. Further, a court (not the supreme court) can determine if the act was official or not.
The highest court didn’t give any president a free pass. If the president is carrying out a function of the constitution there is immunity. For everything else they enjoy no immunity. Like for instance breaking a law.
deleted by creator
Again, incorrect. Stop reading headlines and making decisions. Read the ruling. You are spreading misinformation.
Blatant misinformation and a fundamental lack of understanding of the ruling. Nothing changed. President cannot commit a crime and say it was in official capacity. Obviously.
Misinformation. This does not allow the president to commit a crime and then say it was all in an official capacity. The very act of doing something criminal immediately puts it out of the realm of any official capacity. Obviously.
You cannot commit criminal acts in an official capacity, full stop. It is not possible. The moment your actions are criminal you are no longer upholding the oath you have taken and the action is not official. Obviously.
That’s not true. Criminal acts are not protected, nor can they be made in an official capacity. Furthermore, the ruling says the court that determines official acts is the trails court. Not the supreme Court. Stop spreading misinformation.
Oh yeah so you’ll believe the minority opinion but not the majority. Gotcha. No wonder you’re confused.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator