So its 64-131 between work done by bystanders vs. work done by police?
And casualty rate is actually lower for bystanders doing the work (with their guns) than the police?
So its 64-131 between work done by bystanders vs. work done by police?
And casualty rate is actually lower for bystanders doing the work (with their guns) than the police?
I can’t speculate.
If you feel up for the task I’d suggest running prompts that use Euler a at 20 steps for a given seed using that model and see if results match images on the perchance site.
If they do , then we know the furry model = Pony diffusion
(Though IIRC the furry model on perchance existed before Pony Diffusion. )
Aha. So what you wanted to say was that “Starlight” and/or “Glimmer” are triggerwords for the furry model. Gotcha!
Those are both the furry model tho?
From what I know it is possible to bypass the keyword trigger by writing something like _anime or _1girl
I’d say yes
Add a little code snippet that explicitly selects the model.
If a new update is coming “quite soon”
, then that could be several months from now.
And if the new update means
by default replacing the current (three?) SD 1.5 models
with a single SD 1.5 model.
Why not use all of them? As in older models + the new one , via this system?
//—//
So what I mean by this is;
In the next update ,
The new SD 1.5 model could be available by default
, and if user writes (model:::anime) , (model:::photo) or (model:::anthro)
, then it uses the “older” SD 1.5 models.
Yeah , I understand the situation.
I appreciate you telling me model selection is within the top categories on civitai.
I didn’t know multiple models were being used.
Any chance you could allow a user to specify which model to generate with , to override switching models based on keywords?
Like for example writing (model:::Anime) in the prompt to use an anime model?
Added an EDIT , to give context to “results don’t match”.
//–//
Yeah , that sounds reasonable. Thanks for pinging the dev.
But however I look at it , the Perchance model can’t be the Deliberate V2 model.
I just want the .safetensors file of the perchance SD1.5 model to be available online.
I’m not even going to adress your post.
I’ve heard this lingo before.
Godamn redditors trying to infiltrate the perchance forums.
There’s no reasoning with this rhetoric
That’s fair
But the chatrooms still have to be visible to everyone though?
If not I feel that could open up all sorts of avenues for illegal activity
I’ve implemented that kind of system in my generator: https://perchance.org/fusion-ai-image-generator
I invoke it by letting the user write , for example ,
“photo of a #adjective# #name#”
and then prior before sending the prompt to the generator I run
“photo of a #adjective# #name#”.replaceText(“#adjective#”, adjectives.selectOne).replaceText(“#names#”, name.selectOne)
to get the randomized string
//----//
In Stable Diffusion the “prompt” is not an “instruction” as in ai-chat.
The Stable Diffusion model never refers to the prompt when generating the image.
Instead, it converts the string to numbers and runs them through layers and layers of matrices.
Like a ball tumbling down aling the pins in a pachinko machine.
SD Prompting is very “psuedo-science” since nobody really knows what this kind of grid can and can’t do with the “ball” you throw into it.
Since I’m building a randomizer around this , I’ve covered a lot of topics on this in the fusion discord: https://discord.gg/dbkbhf8H2E
//—//
Also;
NSFW topics are better asked at https://lemmy.world/c/casual_perchance.
Questions asked at this forum are better if written in a SFW context.
I see. Thanks! I can use this.
Since its async , I think what I’ll do is use the code to make a wrapper function for the dynamic import plugin, something like :
myDynamicImportWrapper( “blahblah” , default = “template-fusion-generator-dataset” )
Agree.
IMO The owner of a generator should be entitled to remove content from their image gallery
IDGAF about peoples NSFW preferences , but I’ve had occasional past experiences with users on my generator (fusion gen) who post content for the sake of harassment.
For example scat , geriatrics , bugs and gore , or just writing messages in the prompt. This happens rarely, thankfully.
But having the tools at hand to remove/hide such content would be good.
Those issues are entirely subjective.
Are you even part of the furry community?
This sounds a lot like the rhetoric of someone who is an outsider that seeks to stir the pot because a group offends them.
As long as they don’t invade your space , don’t make an effort to invade theirs.
There are tons of generators on Perchance , each with their own crowd of people.
There is no reason for you to use the furry-generator , unless that is what you are actually interested in.
Please write about it here
What do you mean by “ill behaviour” exactly?
Are we talking people being abusive in the comments section?
Or is this more related to what people generate and post to the galleries?
I will do that. Big thanks for taking the time :) !
I count casualty_rate = number_shot / (number_shot + number_subdued)
Which in this case is 22/64 = 34% casualty rate for civilians
and 98/131 = 75% casualty rate for police