Unless explicitly stated, all content posted by this user, is done so under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 DEED (non-AI).
These two remind me of the early Apple fanboys, completely talking around all the bad parts and focusing only on perceived good parts. Except, here, they’re fan-ing on a decision that was made a long time ago (using tempered glass on side windows) for exactly the reason they state is ‘bad’–it explodes into a bunch of non-sharp shards. This decision was made, and agreed upon by auto manufacturers, to prevent people getting stuck in cars on fire. Internal mechanical releases do nothing when the person inside is unconscious or is a toddler, as is in this case.
I agree. If ff becomes for-profit or starts actively treating the browser as for-profit, it’s only a matter of time before it becomes just as bad as google. Worse, even, since they were once actually good and their turn to the dark side will be perceived as an ultimate betrayal.
But supporting chromium is supporting chrome, which supports google. Not directly, of course, and certainly better than direct chrome, but the underlying methodology is identical. The ff management that caused this to happen should be blacklisted (I’d even support them imprisoned over this). However, knocking ff completely out (including any browser built on it) is not good, imo, as it strengthens Google’s chrome’s/chromium’s hold on the browser market, creating a true browser monopoly. Right now, chromium is open source, but if google becomes a true browser monopoly, how long do you think chromium’s FOSS status will hold? I’m going to venture, not very long. I just never thought I’d have to choose between evil and more evil when selecting my browser…
As bad as this is if true (and it’s abhorrent), is google really any better with how they continuously treat their employees and their produc–er… customers?
I read it as miles. If some_guy meant meters, then that would add such a new level of comedy to it hahaha
Redditors moved here, and brought those habits with them, I guess 🤷♂️
That was dank episode, too
We won’t do that, we promise.
If you think it’s random, then we’re done here.
Read the rest of the comment, before you get angry. You may find that full opinions are a little easier to swallow than the partial you chose to hear.
Ignoring all that. Are he and Biden truly the best that that country has to offer, out of the ~290mil ~184mil native-born citizens over age 35?? I don’t believe that.
Edit: added restrictions on the age group.
I like that boulder. That is a nice boulder.
The only issues I have with a yubi on a phone, is the general fragility of USB-C ports (and that there is only one). On a PC or laptop, you’ve generally got several, so if one breaks and the yubi can’t be used in that port, you’re not locked out.
And hopefully you got paid for mileage…
Maybe. I don’t biometrics on my computers. Only phone. I don’t unlock my computer a thousand times a day using a crappy touch kb. Actually, if the phone had a physical kb, maybe it wouldn’t have been so bad. Not sure.
I wish there was a way to require both biometrics and PIN. They’re both insecure on their own, but together they’re better. Like instant MFA for your unlock. I would enable that immediately, if it was available.
Edit: then a password / passphrase in case one of the other two stops working (as an emergency unlock).
To do:
https://spicetify.app/