Note: This is US only.

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    I don’t think anyone is expecting a refurbished disk to last longer and I don’t know why you’re trying to argue based on that…

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        I expect the failure rate to be higher than on a brand new product, you’re just making the assumption that because it failed once (if it actually did, could simply be a disk that was returned after purchase) it will fail again as quickly, which is a pretty bad assessment.

        • 9point6@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yes, though it’s not an assumption, it’s based on the reputation of Seagate making new drives that fail quickly. I’ve made a point of emphasising this.

          Even if the drives were never used they’ve been shipped about a few places, so they will objectively not be as good as new drives, even movement is potential wear on spinning disks—the new drives that are already shit.

          I’m really sorry, but I’m not really sure how I can spell this out clearer than I already have.