UPDATE:Kurzgesagt's official response: https://reddit.com/r/kurzgesagt/comments/10jlyyk/kurzgesagt_statement_to_the_conflict_of_interest/My response to Kurzg...
The accusation video i did not watch, because they are accusations, I cant prove.
I did read the reply from the channel and based on that response, the intent of the accusation is what my response based on.
I can’t get access their books to verify the claims but if the claim is about who is really paying the bills versus influencing the science delivered then to me valid data is more important than the funding.
Here the problem lies. You’re misjudging something without even looking into it. The video isn’t an accusation per se, but it proposes several recommendations to Kurzgesagt who failed to acknowledge any of them in his “response”.
The video in question is well sourced and documented, it would be a shame to make a final conclusion without looking into what prompted the discussion in the first place.
The accusation video i did not watch, because they are accusations, I cant prove.
I did read the reply from the channel and based on that response, the intent of the accusation is what my response based on.
I can’t get access their books to verify the claims but if the claim is about who is really paying the bills versus influencing the science delivered then to me valid data is more important than the funding.
Here the problem lies. You’re misjudging something without even looking into it. The video isn’t an accusation per se, but it proposes several recommendations to Kurzgesagt who failed to acknowledge any of them in his “response”.
The video in question is well sourced and documented, it would be a shame to make a final conclusion without looking into what prompted the discussion in the first place.