• canihasaccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Chomsky is considered one of the founders of cognitive science. He was the only person who was able to argue away Skinner’s conceptualization of language. Were it not for him, behaviorism may still have been dominant.

    • steventrouble@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Sure, his review of Skinner’s work was very popular, and it did change the field. But replacing one wrong theory with another wrong theory without evidence is not an improvement, and he continued to push his incorrect theory even after clear evidence to the contrary.

      He turned psychology into a popularity contest and it continues to have negative repercussions on the field. It’s “pop science”

      Edit: My bad, Freud turned psychology into a popularity contest. Chomsky merely exacerbated it, or at best did nothing to fix it when he had a shot at the reins.

      • tisktisk@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        I urge anyone downvoting these comments to refute Steve. Downvoting without honest criticism is just petty

        • StereoTrespasser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Steve sounds like your typical Redditor posting about a famous person who has made monumental strides in academia. I’m guessing Steve also has ready-to-paste arguments for anyone who says that Stephen Hawking was intelligent.