A Georgia congressional candidate convicted for illegally demonstrating inside the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, has walked out of a televised debate with a fellow Republican.

A Georgia congressional candidate convicted of a misdemeanor for illegally demonstrating inside the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, walked out of a televised debate with a fellow Republican on Sunday ahead of a June 18 primary runoff.

It was the latest volatile turn in southwest Georgia’s 2nd Congressional District, where Chuck Hand and Wayne Johnson are competing for the GOP nomination to take on 16-term Democratic incumbent Rep. Sanford Bishop in November.

Hand is one of at least four people convicted of Jan. 6 crimes running for Congress this year, all as Republicans. He was sentenced to 20 days in federal prison and six months of probation.

Nixon brought up a 2005 criminal trespass charge and a 2010 DUI charge against Hand, both of which were dismissed. Nixon also cited federal court documents to argue Hand’s participation in the Jan. 6 riot was more serious than Hand had claimed.

“This is where I get back in my truck and go back to southwest Georgia because I’ve got two races to win,” Hand said, walking out of the studio while cameras were rolling.

  • Adderbox76@lemmy.caEnglish
    421·
    5 months ago

    Thanks to trump, they think “debate” is just a fancy word for “argument”. They’re too dumb to even know what Robert’s Rules of Order are, let alone ever actually read them or understand how they apply in an actual debate. They just think that mockery and aggressiveness count as “debate strategies” thinking that winning an argument is about making the other person piss down their leg.

    They literally can’t handle it when the other person doesn’t actually cower before their insanity.

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      11·
      5 months ago

      Can you please elaborate how Robert’s Rules of Order can apply to debates? I quickly Googled it and read how it applies to group decision making, but no idea how it can apply to dialogue.

      • Adderbox76@lemmy.caEnglish
        15·
        5 months ago

        The basic idea of the moderated debate comes from Roberts Rules (I believe). Person 1 has 2 minutes to make his point. Person two has a minute to rebut. Person one than has another minute to respond to the rebuttal. Etc… Etc… That comes straight from parliamentary procedure, which follows Roberts Rules.

        In parliamentary procedure, its moderated by the speaker of the house, but in one on one debates its just a moderator.

        Debates are, at their core, very very structured. Something Trump and co. don’t handle well.