• Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 days ago

      Right? Like it has its moments of good and bad. I mean it’s not an Oscar winner, but it wasn’t so bad that I lost interest.

      Tbh I thought JLo did a pretty good job.

      • CptEnder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        Damn JLo was my main reason not to watch, historically she’s just not that great. But if she pulled it off or made it kinda self-aware I’ll check it out.

        65 is also really good.

        • Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 days ago

          Well it’s still JLo. If you aren’t much a fan you won’t be too impressed. Imo she can be fairly one directional in her movies.

          That said, when I watch a movie that has heavy CGI I try and take a step back throughout the movie from all the special effects and evaluate an actors performance.

          Ya ok sounds pretentious, but I try to imagine the environment they are in when acting. It’s basically nothing but a green box, with someone off to the side reading lines.

          If they can give a fairly believable performance I’m impressed, because we see all the special effects, editing, direction and production. The actor has to imagine it, and hope they don’t look like a dumbass in post.

          65 was alright. Wanted more dinosaurs though lol