no one fucking told me about states banning RCV during all that yapping on here about how i should VOTE THIRD PARTY OR ELSE IM COMPLICIT in the DNCs CRIMES

it may or may not be joever, very blackpilled at this moment

edit it’s actually 10 states. 5 in the past two months.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOPEnglish
      64·
      5 months ago

      ostensible answer:

      “We believe in the one person, one vote system of elections that our country was founded upon,” Missouri state Sen. Ben Brown, the ballot measure’s sponsor, said in an interview.

      Brown and other critics of ranked choice voting contend the system is confusing, and he said there are numerous instances in which voters didn’t end up ranking their choices.

      real answer: republicans don’t win as much when rcv is in place.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.comEnglish
        23·
        5 months ago

        I hate slogans like “one person, one vote” or “innocent until proven guilty” because so many people treat them as principles in themselves rather catchy names for principles that are much more nuanced than those names suggest. It doesn’t matter how many “votes” a person has the ability to cast so long as everyone is given an equally opportunity to influence the outcome of an election.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.worldEnglish
          10·
          5 months ago

          Another one I hate is “Let me ask a simple yes or no question:” Proceeds to ask a very complex question with a lot of nuance

          Then, when the person tries to clarify the person asking just says “I just want a yes or a no.”

          Both parties do it, and it’s just scoring political points every time.

        • BluesF@lemmy.world
          6·
          5 months ago

          Yes as long as it isnt one person 8 votes another person 9. Although, the electoral college somewhat is that anyway… A vote in one state is not equivalent to a vote in another.

    • hannes3120@feddit.de
      131·
      5 months ago

      If you can rank your votes and have multiple options available you actually have to stand for something in order for people to vote for you.

      Being against another party is not enough in such a system since there are more options available.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      41·
      5 months ago

      Can you guess which party that holds a tenuous grasp over their constituents via fear would not want them having the option of voting for other people that might more closely align with their ideals and morals?

      I mean, technically it’s both parties at this point, but Republicans know that RCV will be the absolute death of the current version of their party which has devolved into little more than a reactionary ultranationalist faction.