rat-salute also 15 retweets of adl - pathetic

linky

btw adl is doing some unhinged posting about people’s conference <-link to poast, if you avoid it

  • thelastaxolotl [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Red star after their Cuba trip article, posted one calling for not supporting AOC in her reelection for her support of Biden and then made this one.

    They have been on a roll, i hope they start the presidential election with one article calling for not voting for biden, it would make great dunktank material for all the libs it would piss off

        • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 month ago

          They have 3 members on NPC and one of the two cochair slots. That’s not a majority but if you count BnR and Marxist Unity Group there is a Marxist majority on the NPC.

        • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 month ago

          idk, but if dsa spends millions fighing adl in courts or get hammered by congress, its not good in whatever they control

          • Greenleaf [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            ·
            1 month ago

            Nah, I mean death to America, unlimited genocide on this evil country and all… but in the US simply expressing support for an organization on some official terrorist list isn’t a crime. I’m not sure what the ADL could sue them for that wouldn’t immediately get thrown out of court.

            That said, we do live in a bourgeois dictatorship so of course Congress can find all sorts of ways to make their life difficult, but that’s just to be expected when we’re taking the correct line against imperialism.

            I do commend Hamas, btw

            • Biggay [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              1 month ago

              but in the US simply expressing support for an organization on some official terrorist list isn’t a crime.

              It is in some ways and formats. The podcast 5-4 had a very good episode on this as even offering any level of legitimate/legitimizing support could very easily be interpreted by the courts to be a criminal action.

            • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              Mainly discovery process from frivolous lawsuit with sympathetic judge can paralyze them for half a year, then friendly leaks from unnamed sources familiar with the matter leaking something embarrassing, all this time they have to pay lawyers to fight it all. Like 1st amendment is very malleable

  • flan [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    If America ever decides to get on the right side of this issue there are a lot of non profits theyre going to have to take a hard look at.

  • Xx_Aru_xX [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    حماس الأم حاضنة, بجيش القدس والنصر
    فنعم الجند قسام. أسود في الوغى تجري
    وهم في البحر حيتان, وفي العلياء كالصقر
    وهم بالليل عباد, وبالأسحار والفجر

    عن القسام فالتسأل, بني صهيون بالأمر
    ففي الفرقان كم ذاقو, من الآهات والذعر
    وفي سجيل لم ينسوا, أبابيلا من الطير
    وهذا العصف قد أشفى, وأثلج خلجة الصقر

    • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Can you explain to me what people mean when they say “rules based international order”. I’m gonna look it up as well but I imagine a colloquial answer would be helpful as well.

      • TheWurstman [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        When the west uses the rules based international order as a talking point I presume they mean using international law as a basis for how states interact and behave. The problem is that they mostly mean OUR rules based international order because the way it’s looking now states backed by the west seem to be exempt from the rules.

        Some one else can probably give you a better answer that’s the best I can do

  • Benardsmart@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I saw an advert about a lady on YouTube news so I followed up to her IG page indeed she’s worth to be praised with just $1000 I can now boost of $17,099 Expert Eloise Wilbert on IG✅✅✅✅✅❎❎