A federal judge in Fort Worth, Texas, on Friday blocked a new Biden administration rule that would prohibit credit card companies from charging customers late fees higher than $8.

US District Judge Mark T. Pittman, an appointee of former President Donald Trump, granted a preliminary injunction to several business and banking organizations that allege the new rule violates several federal statutes.

These organizations, led by the right-leaning US Chamber of Commerce, sued the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau after the rule was finalized in March. The rule, which was set to go into effect Tuesday, would save consumers about $10 billion per year by cutting fees from an average of $32, the CFPB estimated.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    137
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    It doesn’t matter to them. They think all they have to say is “Genocide Joe” and they’ve made their argument.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      90
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, because Donny will surely stand up for Gaza much more than Joe ever did…

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        69
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        They don’t like it when you point out that Trump moved the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, tacitly declaring it to belong wholly to Israel. He’s made it very clear what he thinks about Palestine.

      • Delusional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        And you know 100% that if Biden was against Israel and supported Gaza, they’d bitch and complain and say Biden supports terrorists. Bad faith arguments across the board coming from those worthless shitstains.

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nah, the Trump base doesn’t give two shits about Israel/Palestine. And they’ll never know Biden ever tried. I’m pretty sure they’re still talking about the laptop

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Those people aren’t Trump voters, they are tankies at best and accelerationists at worst (with a generous helping of foreign sockpuppets too)

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          They want Donald in office because it is better for China. They don’t give a shit about Uyghur genocide or the fact that “socialist” China is producing billionaires.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        They’ve moved on to his executive privilege move to withhold recordings, because there obviously must be something horribly incriminating involving vocal inflection that doesn’t translate to transcripts.

        • jake_jake_jake_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          or they don’t want to give free sound clips taken out of context for attack ads?

          and would you put executive privilege in quotes if it was the broke cheeto man?

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 month ago

            That’s how right wing news reports it. I didn’t mean to imply wrongdoing myself. I edited to remove the quotes. I’m in complete agreement of his decision. There’s absolutely no need for the recordings other than to truncate them and use them out of context.

    • pop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      Bandwagoning tiny shit like “credit card fees” is not going to change the number of deaths he has funded. But that never was your concern tho, was it?

      It’s about “Biden does good thing for us so we can excuse a genocide he’s causing”?

      Come back when you grow up and you’re done circlejerking on petty little things that your team does.

    • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      “Look, I know Biden actively supports genocide. But if you point that out, then really it is you who is the bigger supporter of genocide. By not supporting Genocide Joe, you are actually a Trump voter.”

      Give me a break. Maybe you’re the problem if your satisfied supporting a party who’s political leanings are so flexible that the only metric they cling to is remaining slightly to the left of the GOP, no matter how far to the right that keeps pushing them.

      The Democrats are already a center right party. At this rate, when the GOP goes full National Socialist Workers Party, the Democrats will adopt the Tea Party’s politics.

      But hey, at least they’ll still be to the left of the GOP, right?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        But hey, at least they’ll still be to the left of the GOP, right?

        Correct. They will be to the left of the outright fascists. And it’s that or the fascists. By voting for anyone else, you choose the fascists. Sorry, that’s reality.

        • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          25
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          No, the reality is that people like you are helping to craft that very future by refusing to stop supporting the Democrats for even a moment.

          Even if stopping for that moment is what is needed to turn the party back into a workers party, and not one that is entirely beholden to it’s donor class, because they know the rubes will vote for them no matter what they do.

          • VubDapple@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            If you are not inclined to want fascist leaders, and assuming you are a person and not a troll, how do you imagine ceasing to support the less fascist party during an election year will result in less fascism?

            • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              We are only driving in one direction. The GOP keeps their pedal to the floor, while the Democrats have been happy just to ease up the gas a little - but not slam on the brakes.

              You’re saying that it’s better to support the Democrats and delay the inevitable arrival at destination Facism.

              I’m saying if ever want to hope to flip a bitch, or even just find an off-ramp, the Democratic party has to be retrained on who they respond to. The only way to do that is to make them more responsive to their voters, then to their donors.

              When facing down the barrel of the unlimited donations and super PACS of their donor class, the only weapon we have is solidarity in not supporting them, until they learn.

              Taking a little medicine now, but with the chance to actually turn this car around, is worth the risk when the other option is just delayed full tilt facism, with occasional letting off the gas for the new Tea Party Democrats, if they aren’t already outlawed by that point.

              • theparadox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                1 month ago

                …and if they instead decide that the left cannot be depended on and start courting voters more to the right?

                I honestly felt how you feel. I just don’t think it’s historically worked that way.

                Push local reps to the left and Primary the centrists. I’m all for it… but going home because your guy isn’t on the ballot is playing a dangerous game right now.

                If the country can handle a Republican win, then go back to staying home in protest. But I think, especially at this point in time, that a Trump win would spell the end of American democracy.

                • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  You realize that courting the right, and destroying the left, has been the current Democratic party establishments playbook for quite a while already…right?

                  That was actually part of the Hillary Clinton’s campaign strategy. But don’t take my word for it, go read up on their well documented belief that they could give up on rural and bluecollar democrats, and replace them with “moderate GOP voters” from the suburbs.

                  Hint: it didn’t work.

                  So… you’re counterpoint is that if I don’t support them, they’ll just keep doing what they’re already doing?

                  I disagree. They’re behave like that because they can. Because despite their base despising their donor first agenda, the base still turns out for them, more or less.

                  The only way to correct that, is to retrain them on who’s needs they need to be responsive to. Absent becoming a billionaire who supports the 99%, the only way is to not support them, and be vocal about why.

                  • theparadox@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    So… you’re counterpoint is that if I don’t support them, they’ll just keep doing what they’re already doing?

                    Yes, that’s my point exactly.

                    The only way to correct that, is to retrain them on who’s needs they need to be responsive to. Absent becoming a billionaire who supports the 99%, the only way is to not support them, and be vocal about why.

                    Here is the painful truth that I realized back when I thought the way you do: They don’t give a flying fuck about us. We’re not numerous enough to sit out, be vocal, and hope they feel our absence. They didn’t in 2016. They didn’t in 2020. They won’t in 2024. We’re too fringe and too few. They just see us as fickle and hard to please extremists. We’d need to bring way more mainstream people with us to be heard. Hell, Gaza is actually getting some mainstream attention and Biden is still blocking UN action and sending Israel billions in weapons.

                    The average democrat voter is more than willing to guzzle the party’s liberal bullshit. Catering to “independents” and the disillusioned right pulls in more than enough votes to outweigh the left vocally sitting out. Have you watched any mainstream media?

                    We need to change the party from within. Be present and involved. Vote in primaries for leftists and support them. Run in the primaries if there aren’t leftists. The thing is that most voters want leftist policies once they understand how they’ll benefit from them.

                    In the meantime, there legitimately may not be an election in 2028 if this fucking psychopath wanna be mob boss gets another shot at a coup. It won’t fucking matter after that - making political change will take civil war.

                • Serinus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  If we’re waiting for one party to collapse, it should probably be the fascists.

                  • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    Likewise, a concerted effort should be able to change the direction of a party. I honestly can’t say if that’s feasible in American politics.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 month ago

            Who specifically should I vote for that has a chance of beating Donald Trump in November?

            Give me a name.

            • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Vote for whoever you want.

              My responses were directed at people commenting, unprompted, about how anyone who doesn’t support Biden, or buy into his campaign messaging, are either closeted Trump supporters, tankies, or (my personal favorite) foreign socket puppet accounts i.e. Russian bots.

              Because obviously they can’t be lifelong Democrats who are fed up with current Democratic establishment and see the threat they pose if left unchanged - precisely because we NEED an actual strong leftwing workers party to stand against the GOP.

              So, again, you do whatever your conscience tells you.

              If your comfortable with a Democratic party that is already fully run by neoliberals, crushes leftists, and only moves further to the right each election, then keep supporting them. That’s on you.

              Myself, I am going to see which option the Democrats are MOST concerned with i.e. uncommitted vs blank vs a specific 3rd party candidate.

              I will also continue to support most of my local and statewide progressive candidates, because I do care, and I’m not whatever fantasy the Biden supporters have concocted so they can dismiss people like me without giving these idea any real thought.