• Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    “protective DNS”

    There is no way there isn’t a hidden agenda. You already could block malicious websites at the browser level

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Doing so at the dns layer is a much better option, as it prevents the end user or malware from bypassing those restrictions with a non-standard browser or modifying the client settings (which shouldn’t happen, but can).

      In an enterprise environment, which is exactly what this is aimed at, that kind of protection is a boon against the random shit end users click on.