What the hell?

Edit - Quoting @[email protected]

Wikipedia is not currently banned in Russia. But the Russian branch of Wikimedia as an organization is. Also, pretty much nobody in Russia uses Ruwiki, everyone keeps using Wikipedia.

That’s all not to say it isn’t a troubling development, though. But Russians are more likely to access Wikipedia through VPN than to rely on Ruwiki. The game’s not lost.

  • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    256
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Graphic designer Constantine Konovalov calculated the number of characters changed between Wikipedia RU and Ruviki articles on the same topics, and found that there were 205,000 changes in articles about freedom of speech; 158,000 changes in articles about human rights; 96,000 changes in articles about political prisoners; and 71,000 changes in articles about censorship in Russia. He wrote in a post on X that the censorship was “straight out of a 1984 novel.”

    Interestingly, the Ruviki article about George Orwell’s 1984 entirely omits the Ministry of Truth, which is the novel’s main propaganda outlet concerned with governing “truth” in the country.

    That last detail…wow. They really don’t want to leave any doubt about what they’re doing, do they?

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I have to wonder, don’t the majority of Russians pretty much know that their government is full of shit? There’s enough of the population old enough to see the fall of the USSR, the time between the fall and the rise of Putin, and then every bit of Putin’s transition to autocracy, to the point that there’s enough word of mouth in private to counter the majority propaganda. Granted, the younger generations will grow up not knowing anything else, especially with older generations dying off or getting killed either via war or suicided by falling out of windows.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        71
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        They do know, but they honestly, sincerely believe that a government of for and by the people isn’t possible for them.

        Source: hosted a Russian exchange student. We had this talk, I suggested that Russia could have a state that works for its people and got laughed at and basically told “we don’t do that here.” And honestly, as an American in 2024 watching our democracy implode in real time so that billionaires can have lower taxes, I get it.

      • humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        56
        ·
        8 months ago

        I have to wonder, don’t the majority of Russians pretty much know that their government is full of shit?

        Let me offer my perspective,as a Russian. People do not want to lose everything like they did in the 90s. Yes, everyone understands that the government is full of shit, but they believe in the belief (google it, an interesting concept) that it’s virtuous to support a government.

        It’s like a classic trolley problem. Yes, you’d probably push that lever, but you know of consequences and you just purchased a car and your wife is pregnant. You are caught in this unending circle, you simply do not want to deal with it because it doesn’t affect you. But when it does affect you, it’s always the west: shock therapy of the 90s, current sanctions, debit card ban, visa bans, etc.

      • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It doesn’t really matter because Russians have never really had a mature democracy and so, I think, do not really know how it should/could be different. They are used to various forms of authoritarian rule; whether the leader is called a Tsar, or a General Secretary of the Communist Party, or a President of the Russian Federation doesn’t make that much difference.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          8 months ago

          Well, that was also true in Korea and Japan before WW2, yet both are shining examples of democracy (with a healthy amount of chaebol/Keiretsu/oligopoly to round it out). Likewise in Germany.

          So it’s not impossible, just foreign.

          • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            Of course it is possible and I hope they eventually develop into a mature democracy. Point is, it has not happened yet.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          “Mature democracies” buy Russian gas and support Azerbaijan.

          Nothing in the past makes an existing democracy more stable.

          What does is culture of bravery\heroics AND fairness AND individualism. Bravery AND fairness without individualism get you communism. Bravery AND individualism without fairness get you either the British Empire or Somalia. Bravery without fairness and individualism get you fascism. Individualism AND fairness without bravery lead to something like most “mature democracies” of today.

          Now, Russia has problems in culture with every one of these. Each of them pops up locally here and there in the social fabric, but the lumpen layers don’t like the idea of fairness and bravery, while the worker class, so to say, doesn’t like the idea of individualism, and the “well off” people are similar to the lumpen class sometimes in this. Bravery is the one most lacking, though.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        Life in Russia is ridiculously tough if you don’t live in a major city like Moscow or St. Petersburg and don’t have a decent job. People don’t really have time to think about Putin and politics, they have to survive. I have some distant relatives there, man is a truck driver, his wife is a teacher. The guy goes hunting and fishing regularly to have food on the table. Can you imagine hunting to survive in a developed country? Can you imagine thinking about politics in these conditions?

        • ma1w4re@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Bruh. Where do they live? I live in a cul-de-sac shit hole with low af pay and nobody seriously goes fishing or hunting to survive. It’s a hobby in every single case.

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        “i have to wonder…full of shit”
        think about how many poeple voted for and continue to vote for Trump and republicans in general here in the US when they have a long and obvious track record.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        One other part of the factor that isn’t often mentioned. Is that they believe and in some small aspects are not mistaken. That the US government is just as corrupt manipulative and bad as theirs. And see critique of their government as hypocrisy. And a lot of Americans feel the same under similar critique.