- Garnet: Running Debian Sid, so affected by vulnerability; hastily downgraded to 5.4.5
- Amethyst: FreeBSD still ships 5.4.x
- Pearl: Obsolete and currently unused hardware, so Linux hasn’t been updated since October and OSX hasn’t been updated since 2009.
- Pearl-II: Void Linux still ships with 5.4.x, and the malware requires glibc anyway (I’m running musl); macOS partition still has 5.4.x (which is strange, given that I use
pkgsrc
, which shipped 5.6.x) - LapisLazuli: According to Mageia, everything’s fine
- Spinel: Running Raspbian Stable, which still ships 5.4.x
Out of curiosity, is there a reason why your machine is called Pearl-II instead of something like Peridot? I also like your names btw
Well, since I started using the naming scheme, I have several lines of machines. Pearl-II (MacBookPro11,1; 2014) is the successor of Pearl (MacBook2,1; 2007), both of which are part of the Pearl line.
Lengthy explanation
Essentially:
I also use the diamonds for my family’s devices, if I need to assign hostnames; and Jasper for any Windows devices or VMs I have to use.
Also, I only bought three of these devices: Garnet, Peridot, and Larimar. The rest I was given by my uncle over the course of about a decade. Essentially, whenever a line gets an upgrade, the other lines rearrange. For example, when I was given Pearl-II last month, it replaced Amethyst as the machine I take to sixth form, so Amethyst replaced Lapis, Lapis replaced the original Pearl, and the original Pearl was retired.
Before I started using this, I just used to use random names that had something to do with the OS, so my ThinkPad was “Nemesis” and my main machine was “Archangel”.