• Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, he’ll defend it fully to his duty so that the defendant can’t claim lawyer incompetence.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sorry, I’m not following. You mean the defendant is fucked and his lawyer he stabbed will try to get revenge on him?

          • Katana314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            IANAL, but: It circles back to the right to fair representation.

            Say he’s convicted, but at a later court, claims “After my totally involuntary psychotic episode, now verified by multiple behavioral psychologists, my lawyer held my unintentional actions against me and did a demonstrably poor job in the remainder of the case. I deserve the right to a fair trial.”

            That COULD be enough to get the case declared a mistrial and re-scheduled.

            • johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              But there’s also a billion reasons you can make an appeal. Most of which have nothing to do with that. Also, being able to make an appeal is a low bar. Most criminal convictions can be appealed…the chance of that appeal overturning the conviction remains low.

        • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Are you saying you think a defense attorney’s job isn’t to do their best to defend their client?

          • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            There could be issues with witnesses or evidence that wasn’t handled properly. The attorney could point out all of those flaws in order to best defend their client. That of course would leave the defendant with nothing to try to apply with. A less thorough attorney might not find those issues.

            • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              OK, but your previous post says:

              Many defense attorneys aren’t there to get their clients out of trouble, especially in high profile cases, they exist to make sure that the law is applied fairly.

              Do stand by what you said about defense attorneys not “there to get their clients out of trouble?”

    • Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I bet that attorney has so much good will for his client that he will give the best defense even though his client is a-hole.