I disagree. As science goes, we must always remain open-minded, yet, the confirmation of a data point will only reinforce an assertion. An assertion such as, “There, still, is no evidence of the supernatural, such as a god or gods.”
And even if we found “something” we’d have to define it. Perhaps it’s just some very advanced, powerful alien like a Q that appears god-like? That doesn’t make it magic. That just makes it advanced beyond our current understanding, and that’s not the same thing.
Atheism is the lack of a belief in god/gods. Anti-theism is the opposition to organized religions and the problems/threats they present to individuals and societies.
You’re assuming a much higher probability for an outcome in your favor than is likely given the available data. While I find your enthusiasm for your hypothesis adorable, I do not share it. “An invisible, omnipotent sky wizard did it!” has never been the answer to any of the great mysteries of science.
I disagree. As science goes, we must always remain open-minded, yet, the confirmation of a data point will only reinforce an assertion. An assertion such as, “There, still, is no evidence of the supernatural, such as a god or gods.”
And even if we found “something” we’d have to define it. Perhaps it’s just some very advanced, powerful alien like a Q that appears god-like? That doesn’t make it magic. That just makes it advanced beyond our current understanding, and that’s not the same thing.
I mean I agree but the meme is still dumb.
Fair
It is not what op was talking about and this do feel anti-atheist
in what way?
In the way that the proof may come out at any minute like the rest of them.
Anti-theism is more about the opposition to organized religion, not opposition to the belief in god/gods.
What do you think we are talking about ? god of course.
Atheism is the lack of a belief in god/gods. Anti-theism is the opposition to organized religions and the problems/threats they present to individuals and societies.
Bruh we were talking about this meme and this meme is what a theist argument will look like, that the proof could be discovered any day .
You’re assuming a much higher probability for an outcome in your favor than is likely given the available data. While I find your enthusiasm for your hypothesis adorable, I do not share it. “An invisible, omnipotent sky wizard did it!” has never been the answer to any of the great mysteries of science.