What are some of your favorite communities that feature topics like literature, science, ecology, aerospace, technology, politics, history, arts, culture, theory, and debate?

Where do responsible, respectful adults go for discussions and for substantive, high quality posts and comments by decent human beings?

(Not just limited to academic/intellectual topics, could be anything from hobbies to defense contracts to careers to skills. Just looking for respectful, reasonably intelligent, informed, relatively engaged communities.)

Also, are forum aggregators like Lemmy and Reddit even the best places to find such communities outside of listservers, universities, and academic conferences?

  • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The paradox introduced by threads like these is that they flood the communities with shit.

    It’s like when you build a really good road or freeway. Everyone starts using it and now it’s not good anymore.

    To me, real excellence is self evident and doesn’t need to be recommended outright

    • bedwyr@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      I take this point to heart. I have no problem with respectful individuals trying to better themselves through enrichment, and hope that the diversity of Lemmy communities translates to bastions of high quality standards not possible on centralized platforms like Reddit. Like anything innovative and somewhat disruptive, Lemmy is another social experiment. Personally I’m optimistic that moderators of many communities will maintain high QC and exclusivity.

      • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        The thing is everyone has a limit with what they can deal with, are shaped by repeated interactions, etc etc.

        We need solid systems in place that work and secure integrity of operation inherently - with or without “good” moderators or admins or owners etc

        • bedwyr@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t disagree. I believe that systems not relying on trust, if cleverly designed, can be simultaneously robust, selective, and autonomously correcting. That being said, the forum format itself, while having inherent drawbacks, is my preferred version of the modern commons for different reasons. It’s not the Platonic ideal of the digital commons, nor, hopefully its last iteration, but I’m hoping Lemmy produces superior communities to Reddit, for instance, simply due to their diversity and decentralized governance.

          • rufus@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I applaud your optimism. And you’re right. The design of the fediverse encourages these properties. But there are also other dynamics at play.

            I wouldn’t describe Lemmy as an intellectual place. It’s more a cross-sectional take on society. It’s a diverse place of common folks, a few nerds, people posting the news, sharing memes or asking questions…

            It depends a bit on the specific community. Some have nice people and active conversation, some don’t. Especially niche topics are a mixed bag. We’re just 50.000 active users so that means for some smaller hobbies you can’t really get a conversation going. But you included some broad topics. I’m sure some of them work well here.

            [email protected] regularly has good posts. Debate and politics work very well all across the platform… I’m not really an expert on the communities here, I hope other people can give good recommendations. Art, literature and ecology also have healthy communities. Sometimes entire instaces dedicated to it.

            I think if you’re willing to share this place with a diverse group of people, you can get happy here.