Regulation could disrupt the booming “kidfluencer” business::undefined

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    well meaning

    You sure about that one? Because I’m pretty sure it comes from selfishness, not altruism.

    • Dankry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You sure about that one.

      Yes. I believe the vast majority of parents since the beginning of the social media age simply never even considered the potential privacy issues at play when they filled their accounts with pictures of their kids. They were just proud parents sharing their lives with friends and family.

      Just because I think it’s selfish and irresponsible does not mean I think the average parent was acting with malicious intent. Social media was brand new for everyone, I’m not going to judge someone too harshly for failing to understand that their social media activity over the years could undermine their children’s right to privacy.

    • theragu40@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Honestly, people are just trying to share pictures and life updates with friends and family. At least, the kind of people the person you replied to is referring to are. It wasn’t something I thought much about until my wife (who is a teacher and more attuned to kids and privacy issues) mentioned she didn’t want our kids to have a ton of people posting pictures of them everywhere. Once I sat and thought about it I was in complete agreement but it quite honestly hadn’t crossed my mind before that.