nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 5 months agoPalworld down 1.3m players in Steam’s biggest-ever two-week dropwww.pcgamesn.comexternal-linkmessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up1100arrow-down140
arrow-up160arrow-down1external-linkPalworld down 1.3m players in Steam’s biggest-ever two-week dropwww.pcgamesn.comnanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square68fedilink
minus-squareFenrirIII@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down1·5 months agoYou missed the ‘/s’ for sarcasm, didn’t you?
minus-squareEatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down23·5 months agoIt’s absolutely 100% part of the reason why I interpreted it the way it was meant to be interpreted.
minus-squareSethayy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down1·5 months agoThe best part of interpretation is how objective it is eh? /s
minus-squareEatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down11·5 months agoI cant believe people are actually arguing that the top level poster wasn’t implying that this article is claiming that palworld failing.
minus-squarePepsi@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·5 months agoi can’t believe it matters this much to you
minus-squareEatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down9·edit-25 months agoI would rather something matter too much to me than be dishonest.
minus-squarePepsi@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-25 months ago🙄 Weird to get self-righteous about your inability to understand clear sarcasm
minus-squareEatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down8·5 months agoAgain, my response took the sarcasm into account. Its more likely that you don’t understand the sarcasm.
minus-squarePepsi@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·5 months agoi mean sure, maybe i don’t get it on the level you do. maybe nobody here has such a refined sense of taste in humor as you. but that doesn’t excuse you being a whiny bitch about it.
You missed the ‘/s’ for sarcasm, didn’t you?
It’s absolutely 100% part of the reason why I interpreted it the way it was meant to be interpreted.
The best part of interpretation is how objective it is eh?
/s
I cant believe people are actually arguing that the top level poster wasn’t implying that this article is claiming that palworld failing.
i can’t believe it matters this much to you
I would rather something matter too much to me than be dishonest.
🙄
Weird to get self-righteous about your inability to understand clear sarcasm
Again, my response took the sarcasm into account. Its more likely that you don’t understand the sarcasm.
i mean sure, maybe i don’t get it on the level you do. maybe nobody here has such a refined sense of taste in humor as you.
but that doesn’t excuse you being a whiny bitch about it.