• Pogbom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    Goddamn… as a fellow celiac sufferer, I’m very sorry to hear that. If the blood tests are pretty conclusive, you can probably assume it’s celiac without the colonoscopy. The downside is that if you start a gluten-free diet now and decide to get a colonoscopy later, it might now show anything since you’re off the gluten. Best of luck!

    • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Oh I’ve had the diagnosis for a few years, and I’ve totally adhered to the dietary restrictions I was given. If I so much as question whether cross contamination may have taken place, I don’t eat the food.

      I’m pretty well stable now and no longer shitting myself. But I know I’m at greater risk of things like colon cancer, which is something that my family has a history of.

      My insurance would “cover” it in that it would go towards my deductible, but that’s still thousands of dollars, and we had to buy a furnace this year because ours died. I’m thinking about going and having it done in Mexico. I have in-laws there.

      Edit: They did more than just blood tests. I’m not going to post all my lab results here obviously, but I can tell you I took shit samples there more than once, and amid all these tests all I could think about was the cost.

      • The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        My wife has a chronic illness with expensive drugs.

        Healthcare is around 35% of our families gross income when you include in the cost my employer pays, what I pay, plus deductable and copays.

        I avoid going to the Dr as much as possible because I have a separate deductible. If I went for everything I should it would be closer to 40% of our gross income.

        • verysoft@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          That country is fucked up. You people really have to come together and demand universal healthcare, as impossible as that sounds.

            • dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Obama improved a lot through Obamacare, but it’s really hard to get a good system in the USA as a lot of people are strongly against free and universal health care, even though it’d likely decrease the amount they have to pay for their own health care too. I really don’t understand it.

              • shuzuko@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                10 months ago

                Oh, it’s very easy to understand. They’re worried their tax dollars might help someone who “doesn’t deserve it”, so they’d rather not help anyone.

              • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                I broadly agree with that, it’s better from the former system in the way that walking on glass is better than being on fire.

                As with a large portion of our fucked up politics, the answer for why people are like this here IMO goes back to conservative talk radio post-Fairness Doctrine. For people who haven’t lived in the rural US, especially before satellite radio, I can’t emphasize enough how much the massive amounts of extreme conservative talk radio shows impact the stuff you hear every day. When the majority of Americans never travel abroad to see otherwise it’s easy to just accept the conservative propaganda that you half listen to for hours a day, every day, for decades.

                • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  it’s better from the former system in the way that walking on glass is better than being on fire

                  Unless you were unemployed or extremely poor, in which case there’s no difference

                  • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    How much that’s true is going to depend greatly on whether or not you live in a state that expanded Medicare. For my home red state, it’s basically the same as it was pre-ACA if you’re poor. Go pound sand, more or less. But in the blue state I live in now the Medicare expansion helps a lot of people. Definitely much less dire than pre-ACA, but still a lot wrong with it.

                    But since the electoral college is controlled by the most unhinged and out of touch voters in the least educated states in the nation, sucks for us I guess.