• MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only thing unreasonable here is that you think you have room to decide what other people do with their own hardware.

      • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        How so? Users consciously choose to install (and keep installed) these programs. Why should your opinion matter?

        • wildginger
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “He consented to me stabbing him dude, I dont get what the deal is. What, do you hate free will? He said it was okay to stab him. Get your hands off me, you cant take me to jail he coNSENTED, HE CONSENTED!!!”

        • xkforce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Arguing that conditioning the use of a game you bought on the installation of kernel level anticheat software designed to watch the user like a hawk is somehow pro user freedom is batshit.

                • xkforce@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Gaming companies are not giving you a choice. You are arguing in favor of the right of companies to force you to install invasive software on your pc in order to use what you paid for. And you dont seem to understand that that is the exact opposite of user freedom.