Online travel agent allows customers to filter out Boeing 737 Max planes::Kayak customers can exclude Max 9 aircraft after cabin panel blowout on Alaska Airlines flight

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    5 months ago

    If this was the first incident with the Max, I’d agree with you.

    But repeated issues close together have caused regulators amd the general public to look closer at Boeing as a whole; particularly their inspection, certification, and maintenance practices. I don’t think this will go away easily.

    I’m starting to see content like this often:

    https://youtu.be/hhT4M0UjJcg?si=sKJbR07hUq40UaV0

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      yes… this does not seem a problem with Max, but one with Boeing. The US passengers don’t really have an option to choose Airbus when most of the airlines’ fleet in the US is Boeing.

      I don’t think this will go away easily.

      We can hope so.

      • BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        Multiple airlines in the US already have majority Airbus fleets. It’s not quite as hard to avoid as you might think

        • Mamertine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Delta is primarily an Airbus fleet. They do not currently fly any 737 MAX planes, though they have ordered 100 Max 10s for delivery starting in 2025.

          I’ll assume they’re being pressured into it by the significant fuel savings the max offers over their current fleet.

          Or, if are willing to fly any of the big 3’s regional brands it’ll be on a regional jet which Boeing doesn’t make. Generally those are made by Bombardier or less commonly Embraer. Though, bigger plane means smoother flight.

          • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’ll assume they’re being pressured into it by the significant fuel savings the max offers over their current fleet.

            Perhaps to replace existing 737s. But the Airbus A320neo has similar fuel efficiency with high bypass turbofans.

            • Swiggles@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Aren’t all commercial plane turbine engines high bypass turbofans? (excluding turboprop)

              Serious question, because I assumed that’s how they all worked, but this sounds like it is special or in spite of and it got me wondering.

              • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                The A320neo and the Boeing 737 Max use larger turbofans for increasingly higher efficiency gains. These larger engines would be scraping on the ground with the original 737 design, which is why the engines had to be mounted further forward and higher on the wings. This is what changes the flight characteristics, leading Boeing to develop the MCAS system to make the plane fly like the older 737s, which famously led to two crashed planes when it malfunctioned.

                The Airbus A320neo did not run into this problem because the landing gear for the A320 are longer and it sits much higher off the ground, so throwing on the larger turbofans still left them with plenty of ground clearance.