As a full time desktop Linux user since 1999 (the actual year of the Linux desktop) I wish all you Windows folks the best of luck on the next clean install 👍

…and Happy 30th Birthday “New Technology” File System!

  • priapus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Making an account to say this seems like the insecure thing. Lol

    Also plenty of Windows users criticize NTFS. It’s just outdated. Windows needs a new option.

    • Gebruikersnaam@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honest question: what are the limitations? Most articles online compare it with FAT, which isn’t really an interesting comparison.

      • duncesplayed@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        To the best of my knowledge, most of the limitations are around allocation. NTFS doesn’t allow for extent-based allocation, delayed allocation, uninitialized allocation, etc. It only has one allocation mode, which is the traditional block-at-a-time (actually “cluster”-at-a-time, though NTFS’s clusters are roughly block-sized compared to other filesystems), which is now thought to be slightly less than ideal in terms of allocation performance and fragmentation.

        And…speaking of fragmentation, I believe NTFS still can’t do online defragmentation??? I can’t see anything that contradicts this, but it’s possible I’m out of date.

        There are other small differences. NTFS has unnecessary filename restrictions, like prohibiting " and ? and things. But that’s typically less important.