Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoNightshade, the free tool that ‘poisons’ AI models, is now available for artists to useventurebeat.comexternal-linkmessage-square279linkfedilinkarrow-up1868arrow-down146cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1822arrow-down1external-linkNightshade, the free tool that ‘poisons’ AI models, is now available for artists to useventurebeat.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square279linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squarehperrin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up223·1 year agoYou don’t follow the license that it was distributed under. Commonly, if you use open source code in your project and that code is under a license that requires your project to be open source if you do that, but then you keep yours closed source.
minus-squarefidodo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up42arrow-down40·1 year agoI still wouldn’t call it stealing, but I guess “broke open source code licenses” doesn’t have the same impact, but I’d prefer accuracy.
minus-squarebamboo@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up90arrow-down1·1 year agoIt’s piracy, distributing copyrighted works against the terms of its license. I agree stealing is not really the right word.
minus-square【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up38arrow-down6·1 year agoNah piracy is with like boats.
minus-squareObi@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down1·1 year agoAnd parrots and wooden legs.
minus-squaretb_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoDistributing it would be one thing, but profiting off it?
minus-squarethanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·1 year agoI think it makes the most sense to think of it like stealing the way plagiarism is stealing.
minus-squareKeenFlame@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 year agoI wouldn’t call pirating stealing either so
You don’t follow the license that it was distributed under.
Commonly, if you use open source code in your project and that code is under a license that requires your project to be open source if you do that, but then you keep yours closed source.
I still wouldn’t call it stealing, but I guess “broke open source code licenses” doesn’t have the same impact, but I’d prefer accuracy.
It’s piracy, distributing copyrighted works against the terms of its license. I agree stealing is not really the right word.
Nah piracy is with like boats.
And parrots and wooden legs.
And buried treasure and rum
And eyepatches and scimitars
Distributing it would be one thing, but profiting off it?
I think it makes the most sense to think of it like stealing the way plagiarism is stealing.
I wouldn’t call pirating stealing either so