YouTube will now direct you to the right first-aid videos during an emergency | Searching YouTube for advice on CPR, heart attacks, or other critical health emergencies will now highlight authorita…::A YouTube shelf of first-aid advice for acute health emergencies from legit sources is now set up to provide advice on topics like heart attack, CPR, choking, or stroke.

  • Trashboat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    If only there could’ve been a way to know if a video is helpful and worthwhile or not at a glance…

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean could we sort the results by likes/dislikes? I don’t remember that being a thing but maybe I am misremembering. Like usually it was “relevancy” whatever is that or views.

      So yeah you could ignore from the result the ones with a lot of disliked but I don’t think we had other than that.

      Of course they could have implemented that as well.

      • Madis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Dislikes are no longer publicly visible, unless you use an extension (which would use mostly crowdsourced or interpolated data). There are extensions that show the likes/dislikes before clicking the video, but you cannot sort by it.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Remember that Youtube works specifically on engagement, which is why everyone gets thrown down the right-wing rabbit hole automatically. They disabled the downvote because it meant less ad revenue for Google since there were videos that people weren’t watching.

    • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, because thumbs up and down has never ever led to shitty content.

      Highlighting actual experts is a far better system.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        We should have some faith in our official institution but were all human. If anything being an expert can make people more prone to serious mistakes because of bias.

        Its in everyone interested for the public to speak up fast if official information is wrong or dangerous.

        The downvote thing is an old issue though. I actually see many other problems but believe it will still end up a net plus.

        My main concern is who choses the expert? Will it be a local one? in the users own language? Or will YouTube hire their own experts to make these videos themselves.

        What do they do if doctors cant agree on a best method but multiple methods have videos online?

      • rab@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean you can still see dislikes with the browser extension, can you link even a single video that’s “shitty content” that doesn’t have a ton of dislikes?

        People aren’t stupid and like/dislike is a good system

        • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          So like, were you actually living in an isolated Afghanistan cave in the first year (fuck even now) of COVID?

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        lol yet here you are participating in a system that you apparently think is shitty lol