For Zuck, it's just another marketing phrase. For developers, it's the rules of the road
  • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
    10·
    1 year ago

    Am I wrong of this is a massive trend with companies developing AI backends?

    They release a previous version, free and open source. Then make a next version completely locked down. Do they event want progress?

    • sodiumbromley@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      18·
      1 year ago

      They want private progress. They want to be the industry leader in whatever it is. They’re not progressing humanity, they’re making a great fiscal quarter.

    • realharo@lemm.ee
      10·
      1 year ago

      Llama 2 is more “open” than Llama 1. Llama 1 was just leaked, and technically not supposed to be available to the public. Llama 2 is actually officially released, even though there are restrictions in the license.

  • falsem@kbin.social
    4·
    1 year ago

    As The Register noted earlier, the community agreement forbids the use of Llama 2 to train other language models; and if the technology is used in an app or service with more than 700 million monthly users, a special license is required from Meta. It’s also not on the Open Source Initiative’s list of open source licenses.

    I’m having a hard time caring about those exemptions…