Image is of Abdul-Malik al-Houthi, the leader of Ansarallah.


The death of Zionism has just massively accelerated.

previous preamble

BRICS has expanded to include Ethiopia, Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. Argentina is currently experiencing technical difficulties due to the election of the ancap clown Milei - once he’s out of office, maybe they can try again.

I don’t really have much to say about this one way or another. BRICS has, so far, made only nervous and small steps towards challenging US hegemony. This isn’t really that unexpected, as only China and Russia are the real “true believers” in ending US hegemony (and even then, China’s government either believes, or is pretending to believe, that reconciliation is still possible). Brazil, India, and South Africa are less enthralled by the concept of dethroning the US, most especially India, who had to make a firm decision in 2023 whether they were going to be on the side of America, or on the side of the Global South, and chose the former, strengthening their military relationship. They’re still best of friends with Russia, but they are very obviously the sussy imposter of the BRICS group.

The prospects of BRICS are only really loosely correlated with the prospects of multipolarism, though. It’s not a process that hinges on BRICS’s successes or failures. It is coming because the contender states (in Desai’s terminology) are irreversibly rising, and the US is irreversibly falling. If it will not be BRICS that leads, it will be a different organization. A better world is not only possible, but inevitable - unfortunately for the US.


I’m taking a week off the updates because I’ve been swamped lately, and also feel the need to reconfigure (and find new) sources. Needless to say that I’ve grown tired of Financial Times headlines, even if they do represent the actual views of the bourgeoisie.


The Country of the Week is Ethiopia! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.

The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week’s thread is here.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful. Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    9 months ago

    17% drop in total votes for the DPP in this election vs the last election is a significant development. TPP took those votes from them.

    TPP 2020: 11.22%

    TPP 2024: 26.46%

    KMT might win the next election if the US comprador vote continues to split in this way.

    • CliffordBigRedDog [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      DPP also lost their majority in the legislative assembly

      idk imo China might count this as a slight win considering how slim of a margin the DPP won the presidency compared to last election

      • zephyreks [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        9 months ago

        DPP support collapsed because everyone wanted a “non-KMT” party and didn’t really care who it was. TPP made a good call not running a joint ticket.

        • TeethOrCoat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          9 months ago

          Wha-? No, it didn’t. DPP support collapsed because people wanted a non-DPP party but also cared who it was. Why do you think KMT and TPP even agreed on a joint ticket (even though it didn’t come to fruition ultimately), in the first place? TPP’s call was pointless as one of their goals was bringing down DPP. In the end, the votes actually show the KMT made significant gains in the legislature, that isn’t indicative of people wanting a non-KMT party.

          • zephyreks [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            9 months ago

            Sorry, I should’ve been more clear: the DPP’s initial success was based on not wanting another KMT government. The TPP ended up deciding that a “joint ticket” where the KMT would likely take the presidentship wasn’t that appealing and they would have better odds running as a third party.

    • TeethOrCoat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      9 months ago

      Eh, KMT are also US compradors though, just less obvious about it. Takeaway should be that while DPP won the presidency, they lost their majority in the legislature. When it comes to mainland relations, TPP and KMT are a lot less hostile toward the mainland, so I expect they’ll be quite united when it comes to addressing that issue.

      • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah but this is a positive result overall. KMT were never going to win but the goal of independence has significantly weakened.

        • TeethOrCoat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ha, that actually depends on who you ask. In the view of mainland Chinese hawks, it’s a positive because this hastens reunification in their mind. In the view of pro-engagement with mainland voters (the 60% of voters in the opposition), it’s no doubt a negative because they have to deal with DPP’s shit economic management and the dread of a possible unfrozen civil war. Western media will think it’s positive because they come to the opposite conclusion as you and think that the goal of independence has strengthened.

    • BovineUniversity@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 months ago

      TPP and KMT were meant to run on a joint ticket this election but their agreement fell through. If they’re smart they’ll be more cooperative in 2028.

    • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I wouldn’t use the results of the 2020 elections since the DPP only won in those margins because Tsai Ing-wen ran exclusively on “wE cAn’T tUrN TaIwAn InTo HoNg KoNg” against her opponent. Tsai was actually pretty unpopular going into the election, and she almost got primaried by Lai Ching-te, the dude who just got a plurality of votes this time. The elections were held when the Hong Kong protests were still in people’s minds. The DPP was nowhere near as popular as the 2020 presidential results suggest. And even then, the DPP’s results in the legislative elections weren’t that good either.

      Since then, the DPP got BTFO in the 2022 local elections. (Fun trivia is Chiang Kai-shek’s great-grandson became mayor of Taipei which is the thing you do when you have presidential ambitions, so there’s a decent chance he will run for president one day lol) Part of the reason why they got BTFO had to do with Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan and the PRC’s response. And now, the DPP has taken even more L’s in the Yuan.

      In the end, this election just exposes the divide in Taiwanese society where no party or individual has anything close to a political mandate, which means any political project like Taiwanese separatism is out of the question. Taiwanese society will continue the status quo of drifting aimlessly with no real direction towards a political objective outside of shallow attempts at social progressivism. Between this and the PRC bribing Taiwanese military to surrender in the event of an invasion, this is a W for the PRC. I suspect the US is also breathing a sigh of relief since they could drum up the results as a W for Taiwan knowing that it isn’t actually a W but not a substantial L either.