Thousands of authors demand payment from AI companies for use of copyrighted works | CNN Business
www.cnn.com
Thousands of published authors are requesting payment from tech companies for the use of their copyrighted works in training artificial intelligence tools, marking the latest intellectual property critique to target AI development.

Thousands of authors demand payment from AI companies for use of copyrighted works::Thousands of published authors are requesting payment from tech companies for the use of their copyrighted works in training artificial intelligence tools, marking the latest intellectual property critique to target AI development.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldEnglish
    31·
    11 months ago

    I don’t think you understand what plagiarism is. When you profit off of someone else’s work, you’re plagiarizing. Libraries do not profit off of anything. OpenAI, however, is a for-profit endeavor.

    • joe@lemmy.worldEnglish
      32·
      11 months ago

      plagiarizing

      This is taking someone’s work and passing it off as your own. Did you not do a simple google search when there was some doubt to the definition, like I just did?

        • joe@lemmy.worldEnglish
          11·
          11 months ago

          Did you read that?

          Plagiarism can happen intentionally or unintentionally when a person uses another person’s ideas or words without citing the original source. Here are four common forms of plagiarism:

          • Copying another person’s words without using quotation marks or referencing the original source
          • Copying an author’s words without using quotation marks but using accurate footnotes to the original source
          • Paraphrasing an author’s ideas without including a reference to the original source
          • Rearranging an author’s exact words, even if there is a footnote to the original source

          Oh no, I plagiarized! lol

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldEnglish
            21·
            11 months ago

            Copying another person’s words without using quotation marks or referencing the original source

            ChatGPT can do that.

            Copying an author’s words without using quotation marks but using accurate footnotes to the original source

            ChatGPT can do that.

            Paraphrasing an author’s ideas without including a reference to the original source

            ChatGPT can do that.

            Rearranging an author’s exact words, even if there is a footnote to the original source

            ChatGPT can do that.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldEnglish
                2·
                11 months ago

                Yes, can. It is capable of doing all those things and, again, if she is correct, will do so if prompted.

                • joe@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  11·
                  11 months ago

                  I think this is nonsense, but you’re saying the issue is that it doesn’t use quotes when someone asks it to quote a passage from her book? Is that true?

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldEnglish
                    2·
                    11 months ago

                    Nope, again, the issue is that it can regurgitate the entire book if prompted. Why you think that’s legal is beyond me. What if it had video. Should it be allowed to spit out all of Oppenheimer if prompted?