• OwenEverbinde
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Except there’s no need to hypothesize about what the “the other side” wants. They have been perfectly vocal about what they think are issues that need to be “solved”:

      • Accurate history lessons
      • Transgender people
      • Women’s ability to have deadly ectopic pregnancies removed
      • “Urban” people
      • The right to protest against the flag
      • Gay people

      If you have enough knowledge of history to know what a “final solution” looks like, you are justified in seeing “the other side” as the main problem.

    • BigNote@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      But since these are mutually exclusive propositions, only one side can actually be correct. Do you really think it’s more likely to be the science-denying conspiracy-minded side? The side that elected a transparent con man and buffoon, and appears to want to elect him again?