Yet.

  • PatFusty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    For all we know the people that are on the right have gone to other platforms. That doesnt stop you jerks from saying im on the right even though im not. For some reason both sides have adopted a “with us or against us” mentality and everyone is a nazi.

      • damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        People throw around the word too much, there are actual Nazis around and we need to reserve the term just for their special brand of evil. Otherwise the phrase gets so watered down as to essentially become meaningless.

        Otherwise they are just rightwing dipshits.

        • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The rightwing dipshits are now mostly nazis though, the moderate and neutral have been mostly boiled off.

          • damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I can only base this on my own government but I’d say about only a small fraction of the right wing party are full on Nazi’s, the rest are just awful people but they’re not evil. Although it is hard to tell because quite a lot in the greedy, which from a distance can’t look the same.

            • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I want to upvote you for your rational take on nazis but downvote you for calling so many people awful.

        • Lilith02@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Watering down language is part of the right wing platform. I think they actually want to be seen as nazis so the term is less powerful. On the other side, they are calling everyone groomers to water down that language as well.

          • Strangle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve had people in this thread say that I advocate for genocide.

            I don’t think the right are the ones watering down the language

              • Strangle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                I know what the word ‘genocide’ means. The left just misuses words all the time.

                I don’t need to ‘do more research’

                • Lilith02@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You definitely could do more research since you disagree with scientific consensus on trans issues and think you know better how it aught to be.

                  I didn’t see anyone accuse you of genocide but from your other comments I wouldn’t be surprised if you did and just didn’t know it or tried to pretend you didn’t because of a technicality.

                  • Strangle@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I would have disagreed with lobotomies too, had I been around for that. I don’t really see the point you’re trying to make here.

                    There really isn’t any such thing as scientific consensus, not as it relates to truth. Science is ever evolving and asking questions, and re-answering old questions when we discover new information.

                    There is no ‘this is settled’ in science.

                    Well, you don’t know what genocide means. It’s okay

          • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sorry, this is the case on both sides. I’m a leftist, and I see it happen from my side all the time. Deflecting and claiming only Republicans do it is ignorant or blatant gaslighting.

            I’m called a nazi sometimes from people in my own party. It 100% happens.

            • jerdle_lemmy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Hell, “gaslighting” itself is a good example of this phenomenon, and it’s mostly on the left.

            • bloopinator@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              You know your political views are truly independent when both the left and right accuse you of siding with the enemy.

            • Lilith02@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m all for saying both sides are bad, because they are, but I’m guessing you either did something to warrant being called a nazi or found a cringey liberal to argue with.

    • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There was already a right wing exodus from Reddit. /r/RedditAlternatives was created during that exodus, which is why their pinned list of alternatives includes things like gab(racists) and ovar.it(terfs).

    • bloopinator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget the classic, “You sure with insert political extremist group on an issue. At least my side doesn’t team up with them.”

      Most commonly seen when talking about Nazis obviously. I’ve been criticized for supporting free speech on social media sites because obviously only Nazis would benefit from being able to voice their opinions without worrying about being deplatformed.

      • jerdle_lemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. Blame/credit (blame in this case) doesn’t travel that way.

        Take the following example: Alice and Bob both support view X. Bob also supports view Y. Y is evil. Then, Bob can be deemed responsible for supporting view Y. But X does not become evil because Bob is. And so Alice is completely fine.

    • Strangle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The right has moved onto other platforms.

      A lot of people on the right who would post online have been banned from most of the left leaning platforms and have found their own places to talk.

      • bloopinator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        And the end result is that every site is an echo chamber.

        The state of the internet in 2023 is more or less, “Do you want the left-wing circlejerk or the right-wing circlejerk?” And if you want a place where people are allowed to express their views even if it disagrees with the majority opinion of the site, that no longer exists.

        I’m sure it must be great if you identify as left or right, but it sure as hell sucks shit if you don’t align completely with either side.

        • Strangle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree so much.

          I love discussing things with people who think differently than I do, that’s how we learn. We should be able to disagree in a civil way and exchange ideas and understand each other and eventually agree to disagree.

          But we can’t.

          Online it’s either one extreme or the other.

          When is someone going to have the balls to create a place where people can argue and talk shit out? Or is that just too mature for the kids online these days who cannot handle a disagreement?

          Maybe there should be online discussions that are age restricted. No teenagers, 30+ adults only. I wonder if that would be better or worse

            • Strangle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean I always try, because I believe in it.

              I think I’ve probably lost 40% of my total upvotes having this conversation though. On reddit when you go too deep into negative karma you need to make a new account because you can’t post in a lot of communities at that point

              • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think you’re speaking with people willing to engage and you’re not seeing it. Downvotes don’t mean people aren’t discussing, it means they don’t agree or they think you’re coming from a trolling place.

                • Strangle@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No no, I don’t mean anyone specifically in this conversation

                  I was more speaking in general.

        • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The end result is that some sites have a lot of white nationalists and some sites have very little white nationalists.

          Conservatives have nothing humane to bring to the table at this point, even if not proudly saddled with your average ethonostate enjoyers, the platform is nothing but a fight against progress during a time where crisis requires it.

          • bloopinator@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I always find it funny (albeit in a depressing way) when people on the left act like anything short of totally open borders is white supremacy.

            Wanna talk about ethnostates? Check out the demographics and immigration policies for countries like Finland, Sweden, the Netherlands, and Iceland. Wanna talk about racism? Ask the average naturalized immigrant how they feel about illegal immigration.

            Supporting more secured borders isn’t racist. The reality is that the American government should prioritize the interests of its own citizens before prioritizing the interests of people from other countries. It drives me up the walls to see how much support our government provides to refugees when meanwhile our own cities are struggling, most often in predominately black areas. Yes it’s a slight false dichotomy to act like we can’t support refugees while also improving our inner cities, but the reality is that we usually fail to do both as they’re often competing interests.

            Is it really “supporting a white ethnostate” to say I’d rather have our country let in more immigrants with college degrees or at least a willingness to work over a bunch of people who have zero desire to integrate or even work.

            “Progress” doesn’t mean trying to increase the population of our cities and diversity as much as possible even if it means bringing in millions of people who will rely on the government to survive, refuse to integrate into American society, and are the literal opposite of progressive. “Progress” means working to improve the lives of the people we have already living here, regardless of their ethnic background. And currently our immigration policy isn’t accomplishing that.

            • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              How many democrats with meaningful power are actually proponents of an “open border”?

              The main times I see the term “open borders” is a bunch of republican sites making strawman arguments. Fact is the border isn’t open and nobody serious really wants it open, but if it’s implied enough then people believe it. The #2 hit on google is an official republican senate website attacking this “open border” policy.

              https://www.rpc.senate.gov/policy-papers/democrats-declare-mission-accomplished-on-the-open-border

              Why this fixation on highlighting immigration in a facetious way to misrepresent the situation? Even the tone-deaf can hear that faint whistle.

          • sab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Which site has the least strawmen?

            I know I shouldn’t go into comment sections of these kind of posts, but man is this depressing.

            • SmurfDotSee@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I know I shouldn’t go into comment sections of these kind of posts, but man is this depressing.

              It really is. So many vapid little monsters. You get to witness the ignorance and hatred spewed from people who think they’re moral beacons for the rest of us. It would be funny if it wasn’t so depressing, like you said.

    • CWSmith@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is also the fact that this isn’t a platform as much as it’s a framework that uses and open protocol. Right leaning people can setup Mastodon, Lemmy, Friendica, and so forth as easily as left wingers.

      The biggest problem in general has been people treating Fediverse setups like traditional ones. Facebook, Twitter, Discord are all run by central companies.

      Mastodon, Lemmy, Matrix, have the benifit of being usable as bases for people to setup individual communities for themselves and still have some networking.

    • PC509@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      For some reason both sides have adopted a “with us or against us”

      I hate this. I hate that if you are not 100% aligned to a certain groups policies, you’re pretty much the devil in disguise. A leftist Democrat that supports the 2A? You’re a “hard core racist bigot conservative that needs to home someone you love die in a shooting to see how you like it!”. Those people are insane. It’s not how the majority thinks, but those that do are very outspoken and loud so they have way more visibility.

      There are a lot of people (on both sides) that can see how extreme parts of their “side” are and are very self aware of those things. They’ll call out their own side for going too far, being too weird, and saying unfactual things. Those are the people that you can have real conversations with. You won’t agree, you won’t change opinions, but the conversation is generally very informative and you’re not getting pissed off at each other (or you do, but you still show each other a mutual respect).

      I cannot stand those with the “with us or against us” mentality. They really need to GTFO. And they absolutely cannot say they are patriots and support America first and everything that goes along with that. Because our country was founded on different principals, people with different viewpoints, and we created ways to allow those various viewpoints to exist together. We WANT to have different viewpoints instead of just allowing one to flourish and grow to an extreme and heavy handed policy. If you support the “Us” part of that, we are ALL with us, even if our views are opposing and we refuse to even meet in the middle.

      • constnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I cannot stand those with the “with us or against us” mentality. They really need to GTFO.

        In other words, if they aren’t with you they are against you?

        • jerdle_lemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          As someone with similar views, I recently realised that I have the exact same tribalism and aggression, it’s just targeted at people who have that mentality.

    • systemglitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like seeing things forbwhat they really are, so I consider myself a centrist. Both sides hate me they are so brainwashed.

      Neither side has all the answers. Both sides have valid points, but these fools choosing a side stop using their brains to think for themselves, and just puppet whatever the rest of their cult is parroting.

        • bloopinator@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Centrism is just being able to acknowledge that both parties have flaws. If you can’t find any issues with the party you support, that means that you got your political views from someone else instead of developing them yourself.

          People on a left-leaning site don’t wanna hear it, but US Democrats aren’t perfect. Their policy on immigration is not sustainable. A de facto open border policy for refugees and people who cross illegally while people with college degrees can’t even get a work visa is absurd. As a nation we are not obligated to help others when many of our own citizens are struggling. Biden’s student debt relief plan would have caused tuition prices to increase at an even faster rate than before and guaranteed further debt relief executive orders would be required in the future. Plus it set an insane precedent that the president could authorize billions in spending without any congressional oversight. Democrats were frightengly authoritarian during COVID with stuff like vaccine mandates and online censorship. Things were labelled as “misinformation” and later accepted to be the truth… repeatedly, and people simply didn’t care. One day you could get banned from every social media site for saying COVID may have come from a lab, and the next day it was perfectly plausible. That stuff would have been unthinkable prior to 2020 and it’s just apparently normal today.

          And then there is the stuff where they’re just hypocritical or simply providing lip service. Biden could remove marijuana’s schedule 1 classification today with an executive order, but he won’t. Instead his administion argued in court that marijuana users cannot be trusted owning firearms and the ATF is right to prohibit them from buying guns. Speaking of guns, Biden also signed an executive order declaring pistol braces to be stocks after years of the ATF saying they weren’t stocks, making millions of gun owners into felons, many who didn’t even know about the reclassification. A piece of plastic that was legal one day is now 10 years in federal prison. Democrats are guilty of putting corporate interests before individual interests, much like republicans. Democrats love to talk about how much they care about the environment and climate change, but would sooner pass a law saying people can’t set their AC below 80 degrees than dare invest money into nuclear power or stop subsidizing fossil fuels.

          You don’t have to agree with everything I said here. But if you can’t find anything to criticize about your preferred party, or at least acknowledge that these are valid criticisms even if you disagree with them, you are part of the problem.

          “Centrists” gets tons of hate online that’s unwarranted IMO. “Centrism” is just a label people like to put on independent voters because mocking them by acting like their political position can be summed up as “Democrats have some good points, but the Nazis do too” is an easy way to dismiss them, when the reality is that most centrists are voters who get no representation since we have a broken-ass two-party system. Admitting that the two-party system is bad doesn’t benefit you if you support one of those two parties. So here we are.

            • bloopinator@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Is there really anything to say there that everyone in this comment thread would be surprised by?

              Republicans care too much about culture war BS

              Republicans are blatantly wrong on the issue of abortion, and it’s actually baffling that they continue to oppose abortion even though it’s going to cost them elections

              Environment. Need I say more?

              Republicans are guilty of supporting giant corporations and serving corporate interests just as much as democrats. The only reason I don’t say they’re more guilty than Democrats is because companies that I consider to be some of the most monopolistic and controlling are tech and media companies that get much more support from democrats. I consider it a tie until one party either blocks a corporate merger or breaks up a monopoly.

              I touched on Democrats being creepily authoritarian regarding speech, but of course Republicans are just as eager to censor when they have the opportunity as well.

              I could go on, but these are the glaring issues I can think of that immediately come to mind.

              • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                What about Desantis being authoritarian and creating his own militia for Florida, Trump going after Muslims and other non-white people, trump encouraging his base (all republicans) to perform a failed coup? You seem to be watering down some very serious things on the republican side. I’m glad you’re sending your best efforts, but it’s not going to be enough here, at least right now.

                • 👁️🫦👁️@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  He reactivated the Florida State Guard. The samekingd of State Guard utilized by like 22 other states including California and New York. The FSG was created way before DeSantis came to office.

              • homosapient@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                To be honest, it looks like you are biased to the republican side.

                You make good points though.

                • bloopinator@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Based on two comments I made do you truly think I’m “biased toward the Republican side” or are you just assuming that because you automatically assume anyone who disagrees with Democrats on certain issues is a Republican sympathizer?

          • ninchuka@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I dont think anyone on the left would say the democrats in the US are perfect, in the UK we hate labour since the leader is defiantly not left leaning and the party has fallen in the past few years

        • PatFusty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Centrist doesnt always mean fence sitter… could just mean you agree with different points opposite of the eisle. Its almost like this whole political system wasnt intended to have a 2 party system or something…

      • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s hard because everyone 100% has a different definition for every political party/leaning. I’m proud of you for sticking to being open to consider all points if view.

        I’m a leftist, but I love having my views pushed against, and I am open to having my views changed on what I believe and think if I find the argument persuasive enough. It really is a sort of cancer that both sides tend to refuse to even consider they might be wrong on anything.

        Keep on doing you, the downvotes don’t mean your outlook politically is wrong or bad.