• ATQ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol. Twitter has no no case. If they haven’t objected to Truth Social or Mastodon they’re gonna have a hell of a time objecting to Threads.

    • unstable_confusion@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Can’t copyright an idea, and software isn’t patentable as far as I know. Trademark isn’t being infringed. So what does that leave? Design rights maybe? I haven’t seen Threads, but there’s nothing particularly unique about Twitter’s design that you can’t find in tons of other apps already, as you say.

      Twitter’s moat was its brand and userbase. Both of which Musk has spaffed away. Deliberately weakening the brand with “Titter” jokes, and alienating users.

      Twitter CEO Linda Yaccarino said in a tweet on Thursday that while the platform, which has previously reported about 260 million monthly users, is “often imitated” it “can never be duplicated”.

      Erm, ok then. What’s the complaint

      • Notorious@lemmy.linkM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Twitter is claiming that Meta hired all of the people that Twitter laid off and have stolen their “trade secrets”. Considering that Threads uses ActivityPub I don’t believe their claims have merit.

        In my opinion, Elon sees this as the only opportunity to recoup the billions he lost by purchasing Twitter.