Pope Francis has formally approved allowing priests to bless same-sex couples, with a new document explaining a radical change in Vatican policy by insisting that people seeking God’s love and mercy shouldn’t be subject to “an exhaustive moral analysis” to receive it.

  • snooggums@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Acknowledging our arbitrary bigoted views and changing for the better to be accepting of differences. For example, moving past homophobia.

    • rah@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      That seems like a very narrow definition. Are you sure you’re not just spouting your opinion?

      • wildginger
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Do you think definitions are vetted based on broadness?

              • wildginger
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Can you not answer the question? I didnt think it was very hard. Did you not understand what you were asked?

                • rah@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Did you not understand what you were asked?

                  No. You haven’t explained who is doing the vetting you’re asking about, which is critical to answering.

                  • wildginger
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    I asked you, pumpkin. Youre the one who answers. If I was answering my own questions, I wouldnt be talking to you.

                    Do you need a pad of paper? Maybe some crayons? This isnt normally a difficult question.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Provide a definition if you think my very broad description with a single example out of many possible examples is inaccurate.

          • snooggums@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            You questioned whether I was just spouting an opinion, which would imply that it was inaccurate.

            Feel free to provide a definition.

            • rah@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              You questioned whether I was just spouting an opinion, which would imply that it was inaccurate.

              Would imply what was inaccurate?

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Imagine if you contributed to the discussion rather than did a poor attempt at the Socratic Method…