Congress has approved legislation that would prevent any president from withdrawing the United States from NATO without approval from the Senate or an Act of Congress. The measure, spearheaded by Sens. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) and Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), was included in the annual National Defense Authorization Act, which passed out of the House on Thursday and is expected to be signed by President Biden.

  • invno1@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    No, you are missing the entire point of three branches of government. They are there as a check and balance of power to the others. They are literally supposed to stop the other branches from overstepping.

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s been established that the president is in charge of foreign treaties. So it is congress that is overstepping here.

      • Elderos@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Article II section 2 of the constitution requires approval from the senate to ratify treaties, which is then up to the president to ratify and implement. Both branches of the government are supposed to work together to establish foreign policies, this is part of the check and balances. If you have sources interpreting article II section 2 differently I’d be curious to see.

        • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          NATO is a mutual defense treaty that is in practice enforced by US armed forces. If you accept that the President is Commander-in-chief of the armed forces, if He chooses not to respect the terms of the treaty by not deploying the armed forces, then in what way does congress get a say without grossly violating the separation of powers?